Increasing fracture complexity in ultra-low permeable subterranean formation using degradable particulate

ABSTRACT

A method of increasing the fracture complexity in a treatment zone of a subterranean formation is provided. The subterranean formation is characterized by having a matrix permeability less than 1.0 microDarcy. The method includes the step of pumping one or more fracturing fluids into a far-field region of a treatment zone of the subterranean formation at a rate and pressure above the fracture pressure of the treatment zone. A first fracturing fluid of the one or more fracturing fluids includes a first solid particulate, wherein: (a) the first solid particulate includes a particle size distribution for bridging the pore throats of a proppant pack previously formed or to be formed in the treatment zone; and (b) the first solid particulate comprises a degradable material. In an embodiment, the first solid particulate is in an insufficient amount in the first fracturing fluid to increase the packed volume fraction of any region of the proppant pack to greater than 73%. Similar methods using stepwise fracturing fluids and remedial fracturing treatments are provided.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This is a continuation-in-part of: (a) co-pending U.S. application Ser.No. 12/512,232, filed Jul. 30, 2009, having for named inventors ThomasD. Welton and Bradley L. Todd, entitled “Methods of Fluid Loss Controland Fluid Diversion in Subterranean Formations,” which is incorporatedby reference; and (b) co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No.12/957,522, filed on Dec. 1, 2010, having for named inventors Thomas D.Welton and Bradley L. Todd, entitled “Methods of Providing Fluid LossControl or Diversion,” which is incorporated by reference.

BACKGROUND

1. Technical Field

The inventions generally relate to the field of producing crude oil ornatural gas from a well. More particularly, the inventions are directedto improved methods and well fluids for use in wells.

2. Background Art

Oil & Gas Reservoirs

In the context of production from a well, oil and gas (in this contextreferring to crude oil and natural gas) are well understood to refer tohydrocarbons naturally occurring in certain subterranean formations. Ahydrocarbon is a naturally occurring organic compound comprisinghydrogen and carbon. A hydrocarbon molecule can range from being assimple as methane (CH₄) to a large, highly complex molecule. Petroleumis a mixture of many different hydrocarbons.

A subterranean formation is a body of rock that has sufficientlydistinctive characteristics and is sufficiently continuous forgeologists to describe, map, and name it. In the context of formationevaluation, the term refers to the volume of rock seen by a measurementmade through a wellbore, as in a log or a well test. These measurementsindicate the physical properties of this volume of rock, such as theproperty of permeability.

A subterranean formation containing oil or gas is sometimes referred toas a reservoir. A reservoir is a subsurface, porous, permeable, ornaturally fractured rock body in which oil or gas is stored. Mostreservoir rocks are limestones, dolomites, sandstones, or a combinationof these. The four basic types of hydrocarbon reservoirs are oil,volatile oil, gas condensate, and dry gas.

An oil reservoir generally contains three fluids—gas, oil, andwater—with oil the dominant product. In the typical oil reservoir, thesefluids become vertically segregated because of their differentdensities. Gas, the lightest, occupies the upper part of the reservoirrocks; water, the lower part; and oil, the intermediate section. Inaddition to its occurrence as a cap or in solution, gas may accumulateindependently of the oil; if so, the reservoir is called a gasreservoir. Associated with the gas, in most instances, are salt waterand some oil.

Volatile oil reservoirs are exceptional in that during early productionthey are mostly productive of light oil plus gas, but, as depletionoccurs, production can become almost completely gas. Volatile oils areusually good candidates for pressure maintenance, which can result inincreased reserves.

In a gas condensate reservoir, the hydrocarbons may exist as a gas, but,when brought to the surface, some of the heavier hydrocarbons condenseand become a liquid.

In the typical dry gas reservoir natural gas exists only as a gas andproduction is only gas plus fresh water that condenses from the flowstream reservoir. The conventional natural gas reservoirs have a matrixpermeability in the range of about 500 milliDarcy to about 1 milliDarcy.

A reservoir is in a shape that will trap hydrocarbons and that iscovered by a relatively impermeable rock, known as cap rock. The caprock forms a barrier above reservoir rock so that fluids cannot migratebeyond the reservoir. A cap rock capable of being a barrier to fluidmigration on a geological time scale has a permeability that is lessthan about 1 microDarcy. Cap rock is commonly salt, anhydrite, or shale.

A conventional reservoir is a reservoir where the hydrocarbons flow tothe wellbore in a manner in which the system can be characterized byflow through permeable media, where the permeability may or may not havebeen altered near the wellbore, or flow through permeable media to apermeable (conductive), bi-wing fracture placed in the formation. Inaddition, the hydrocarbons location in the reservoir are held in placeby an upper, impermeable barrier and different reservoir fluids arelocated vertically based on their density where the movement of one ofthe reservoir fluid can apply a driving force to another reservoirfluid. A convention reservoir would typically have a matrix permeabilitygreater than about 1 milliDarcy (equivalent to about 1,000 microDarcy).

Tight gas, however, is natural gas that is difficult to access becausethe matrix permeability is relatively low. Generally, tight gas is in asubterranean formation having a matrix permeability in the range ofabout 1 milliDarcy to about 0.01 milliDarcy (equivalent to about 10microDarcy). Conventionally, to produce tight gas it is necessary tofind a “sweet spot” where a large amount of gas is accessible, andsometimes to use various means to create a reduced pressure in the wellto help draw the gas out of the formation.

In addition, shale can include relatively large amounts of organicmaterial compared with other types of rock. Shale is a sedimentary rockderived from mud. Shale rock is commonly finely laminated (bedded).Particles in shale are commonly clay minerals mixed with tiny grains ofquartz eroded from pre-existing rocks. Shale is a type of sedimentaryrock that contains clay and minerals such as quartz. Gas is verydifficult to produce from shale, however, because the matrixpermeability of the shale is often less than about 1 microDarcy.

A reservoir may be located under land or under the seabed off shore. Oiland gas reservoirs are typically located in the range of a few hundredfeet (shallow reservoirs) to a few tens of thousands of feet (ultra-deepreservoirs) below the surface of the land or seabed.

Producing Oil and Gas

To produce oil or gas from a reservoir, a wellbore is drilled into asubterranean formation, which may be the reservoir or adjacent to thereservoir. A well includes at least one wellbore. The wellbore refers tothe drilled hole, including any cased or uncased portions of the well.The borehole usually refers to the inside wellbore wall, that is, therock face or wall that bounds the drilled hole. A wellbore can haveportions that are vertical, horizontal, or anything in between, and itcan have portions that are straight, curved, or branched. The wellheadis the surface termination of a wellbore, which surface may be on landor on a seabed. As used herein, “uphole,” “downhole,” and similar termsare relative to the direction of the wellhead, regardless of whether awellbore portion is vertical or horizontal.

Broadly, a zone refers to an interval of rock along a wellbore that isdifferentiated from surrounding rocks based on hydrocarbon content orother features, such as perforations or other fluid communication withthe wellbore, faults, or fractures. The near-wellbore region of a zoneis usually considered to include the matrix of the rock within a fewinches of the borehole. As used herein, the near-wellbore region of azone is considered to be anywhere within about 12 inches of thewellbore. The far-field region of a zone is usually considered thematrix of the rock that is beyond the near-wellbore region.

Generally, well services include a wide variety of operations that maybe performed in oil, gas, geothermal, or water wells, such as drilling,cementing, completion, and intervention. These well services aredesigned to facilitate or enhance the production of desirable fluidsfrom or through a subterranean formation.

Drilling is the process of drilling the wellbore. After the hole isdrilled, sections of steel pipe, referred to as casing, which areslightly smaller in diameter than the borehole, are placed in at leastthe uppermost portions of the wellbore. The casing provides structuralintegrity to the newly drilled borehole.

Cementing is a common well operation. For example, hydraulic cementcompositions can be used in cementing operations in which a string ofpipe, such as casing or liner, is cemented in a wellbore. The cementedstring of pipe isolates different zones of the wellbore from each otherand from the surface. Hydraulic cement compositions can be use inprimary cementing of the casing or in completion operations. Hydrauliccement compositions can also be utilized in intervention operations,such as in plugging highly permeable zones or fractures in zones thatmay be producing too much water, plugging cracks or holes in pipestrings, and the like.

Completion is the process of making a well ready for production orinjection. This principally involves preparing a zone of the wellbore tothe required specifications, running in the production tubing andassociated downhole equipment, as well as perforating and stimulating asrequired.

Intervention is any operation carried out on a well during or at the endof its productive life that alters the state of the well or wellgeometry, provides well diagnostics, or manages the production of thewell. Workover can broadly refer to any kind of well intervention thatinvolves invasive techniques, such as wireline, coiled tubing, orsnubbing. More specifically, though, workover refers to the process ofpulling and replacing a completion.

As used herein, a “well fluid” broadly refers to any fluid adapted to beintroduced into a well for any well-servicing purpose. A well fluid canbe, for example, a drilling fluid, a cementing fluid, a treatment fluid,or a spacer fluid. If a well fluid is to be used in a relatively smallvolume, for example less than about 200 barrels, it is sometimesreferred to in the art as a wash, dump, slug, or pill.

As used herein, “into a well” means introduced at least into and throughthe wellhead. According to various techniques known in the art,equipment, tools, or well fluids can be directed from the wellhead intoany desired portion of the wellbore. Additionally, a well fluid can bedirected from a portion of the wellbore into the rock matrix of a zone.

Drilling and Drilling Fluids

The well is created by drilling a hole into the earth (or seabed) with adrilling rig that rotates a drill string with a drilling bit attached tothe downward end. Usually the borehole is anywhere between about 5inches (13 cm) to about 36 inches (91 cm) in diameter. The boreholeusually is stepped down to a smaller diameter the deeper the wellbore asupper portions are cased or lined, which means that progressivelysmaller drilling strings and bits must be used to pass through theuphole casing or liner.

While drilling an oil or gas well, a drilling fluid is circulateddownhole through a drillpipe to a drill bit at the downhole end, outthrough the drill bit into the wellbore, and then back uphole to thesurface through the annular path between the tubular drillpipe and theborehole. The purpose of the drilling fluid is to maintain hydrostaticpressure in the wellbore, to lubricate the drill string, and to carryrock cuttings out from the wellbore.

The drilling fluid can be water-based or oil-based. Oil-based fluidstend to have better lubricating properties than water-based fluids,nevertheless, other factors can mitigate in favor of using a water-baseddrilling fluid.

In addition, the drilling fluid may be viscosified to help suspend andcarry rock cuttings out from the wellbore. Rock cuttings can range insize from silt-sized particles to chunks measured in centimeters.Carrying capacity refers to the ability of a circulating drilling fluidto transport rock cuttings out of a wellbore. Other terms for carryingcapacity include hole-cleaning capacity and cuttings lifting.

Cementing and Hydraulic Cement Compositions

In performing cementing, a hydraulic cement composition is pumped as afluid (typically in the form of suspension or slurry) into a desiredlocation in the wellbore. For example, in cementing a casing or liner,the hydraulic cement composition is pumped into the annular spacebetween the exterior surfaces of a pipe string and the borehole (thatis, the wall of the wellbore). The cement composition is allowed time toset in the annular space, thereby forming an annular sheath of hardened,substantially impermeable cement. The hardened cement supports andpositions the pipe string in the wellbore and bonds the exteriorsurfaces of the pipe string to the walls of the wellbore.

Hydraulic cement is a material that when mixed with water hardens orsets over time because of a chemical reaction with the water. Becausethis is a chemical reaction with the water, hydraulic cement is capableof setting even under water. The hydraulic cement, water, and any othercomponents are mixed to form a hydraulic cement composition in theinitial state of a slurry, which should be a fluid for a sufficient timebefore setting for pumping the composition into the wellbore and forplacement in a desired downhole location in the well.

Well Treatments and Treatment Fluids

Drilling, completion, and intervention operations can include varioustypes of treatments that are commonly performed in a wellbore orsubterranean formation. For example, a treatment for fluid-loss controlcan be used during any of drilling, completion, and interventionoperations. During completion or intervention, stimulation is a type oftreatment performed to enhance or restore the productivity of oil andgas from a well. Stimulation treatments fall into two main groups:hydraulic fracturing and matrix treatments. Fracturing treatments areperformed above the fracture pressure of the subterranean formation tocreate or extend a highly permeable flow path between the formation andthe wellbore. Matrix treatments are performed below the fracturepressure of the formation. Other types of completion or interventiontreatments can include, for example, gravel packing, consolidation, andcontrolling excessive water production.

As used herein, the word “treatment” refers to any treatment forchanging a condition of a wellbore or an adjacent subterraneanformation. Examples of treatments include fluid-loss control, isolation,stimulation, or conformance control; however, the word “treatment” doesnot necessarily imply any particular treatment purpose.

A treatment usually involves introducing a treatment fluid into a well.As used herein, a “treatment fluid” is a fluid used in a treatment.Unless the context otherwise requires, the word “treatment” in the term“treatment fluid” does not necessarily imply any particular treatment oraction by the fluid. If a treatment fluid is to be used in a relativelysmall volume, for example less than about 200 barrels, it is sometimesreferred to in the art as a slug or pill.

As used herein, a “treatment zone” refers to an interval of rock along awellbore into which a treatment fluid is directed to flow from thewellbore. Further, as used herein, “into a treatment zone” means intoand through the wellhead and, additionally, through the wellbore andinto the treatment zone.

The following are some general descriptions of common well treatmentsand associated treatment fluids. Of course, other well treatments andtreatment fluids are known in the art.

Well Treatment—Fluid-Loss Control

Fluid loss refers to the undesirable leakage of a fluid phase of a wellfluid into the permeable matrix of a zone, which zone may or may not bea treatment zone. Fluid-loss control refers to treatments designed toreduce such undesirable leakage. Providing effective fluid-loss controlfor well fluids during certain stages of well operations is usuallyhighly desirable.

The usual approach to fluid-loss control is to substantially reduce thepermeability of the matrix of the zone with a fluid-loss controlmaterial that blocks the permeability at or near the face of the rockmatrix of the zone. For example, the fluid-loss control material may bea particulate that has a size selected to bridge and plug the porethroats of the matrix. All else being equal, the higher theconcentration of the particulate, the faster bridging will occur. As thefluid phase carrying the fluid-loss control material leaks into theformation, the fluid-loss control material bridges the pore throats ofthe matrix of the formation and builds up on the surface of the boreholeor fracture face or penetrates only a little into the matrix. Thebuildup of solid particulate or other fluid-loss control material on thewalls of a wellbore or a fracture is referred to as a filter cake.Depending on the nature of a fluid phase and the filter cake, such afilter cake may help block the further loss of a fluid phase (referredto as a filtrate) into the subterranean formation. A fluid-loss controlmaterial is specifically designed to lower the volume of a filtrate thatpasses through a filter medium.

After application of a filter cake, however, it may be desirable torestore permeability into the formation. If the formation permeabilityof the desired producing zone is not restored, production levels fromthe formation can be significantly lower. Any filter cake or any solidor polymer filtration into the matrix of the zone resulting from afluid-loss control treatment must be removed to restore the formation'spermeability, preferably to at least its original level. This is oftenreferred to as clean up.

A variety of fluid-loss control materials have been used and evaluatedfor fluid-loss control and clean-up, including foams, oil-solubleresins, acid-soluble solid particulates, graded salt slurries, linearviscoelastic polymers, and heavy metal-crosslinked polymers. Theirrespective comparative effects are well documented.

Fluid-loss control materials are sometimes used in drilling fluids or intreatments that have been developed to control fluid loss. A fluid-losscontrol pill is a treatment fluid that is designed or used to providesome degree of fluid-loss control. Through a combination of viscosity,solids bridging, and cake buildup on the porous rock, these pillsoftentimes are able to substantially reduce the permeability of a zoneof the subterranean formation to fluid loss. They also generally enhancefilter-cake buildup on the face of the formation to inhibit fluid flowinto the formation from the wellbore.

Fluid-loss control pills typically comprise an aqueous base fluid and ahigh concentration of a gelling agent polymer (usually crosslinked), andsometimes, bridging particles, like graded sand, graded saltparticulate, or sized calcium carbonate particulate. A commonly usedfluid-loss control pills contain high concentrations (100 to 150lbs/1000 gal) of derivatized hydroxyethylcellulose (“HEC”). HEC isgenerally accepted as a gelling agent affording minimal permeabilitydamage during completion operations. Normally, HEC polymer solutions donot form rigid gels, but control fluid loss by a viscosity-regulated orfiltration mechanism. Some other gelling agent polymers that have beenused include xanthan, guar, guar derivatives,carboxymethylhydroxyethylcellulose (“CMHEC”), and starch. Viscoelasticsurfactants can also be used.

As an alternative to forming linear polymeric gels for fluid-losscontrol, crosslinked gels often are used. Crosslinking the gelling agentpolymer creates a gel structure that can support solids as well asprovide fluid-loss control. Further, crosslinked fluid-loss controlpills have demonstrated that they require relatively limited invasion ofthe formation face to be fully effective. To crosslink the gelling agentpolymers, a suitable crosslinking agent that comprises polyvalent metalions is used. Aluminum, titanium, and zirconium are common examples.

A preferred crosslinkable gelling agent for fluid-loss control pills aregraft copolymers of a hydroxyalkyl cellulose, guar, or hydroxypropylguar that are prepared by a redox reaction with vinyl phosphonic acid.The gel is formed by hydrating the graft copolymer in an aqueoussolution containing at least a trace amount of at least one divalentcation. The gel is crosslinked by the addition of a Lewis base orBronsted-Lowrey base so that pH of the aqueous solution is adjusted fromslightly acidic to slightly basic. Preferably, the chosen base issubstantially free of polyvalent metal ions. The resulting crosslinkedgel demonstrates shear-thinning and rehealing properties that providerelatively easy pumping, while the rehealed gel provides good fluid-losscontrol upon placement. This gel can be broken by reducing the pH of thefluid or by the use of oxidizers. Some fluid-loss pills of this type aredescribed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,304,620, assigned to Halliburton EnergyServices, the relevant disclosure of which is incorporated herein byreference. Fluid-loss control pills of this type are commerciallyavailable under the trade name “K-MAX” from Halliburton Energy ServicesInc. in Duncan, Okla.

Well Treatment—Acidizing

A widely used stimulation technique is acidizing, in which a treatmentfluid including an aqueous acid solution is introduced into theformation to dissolve acid-soluble materials. In this way, hydrocarbonfluids can more easily flow from the formation into the well. Inaddition, an acid treatment can facilitate the flow of injectedtreatment fluids from the well into the formation.

Acidizing techniques can be carried out as matrix acidizing proceduresor as acid fracturing procedures.

In matrix acidizing, an acidizing fluid is injected from the well intothe formation at a rate and pressure below the pressure sufficient tocreate a fracture in the formation. In sandstone formations, the acidprimarily removes or dissolves acid soluble damage in the near wellboreregion and is thus classically considered a damage removal technique andnot a stimulation technique. In carbonate formations, the goal is toactually a stimulation treatment where in the acid forms conductedchannels called wormholes in the formation rock. Greater details,methodology, and exceptions can be found in “Production Enhancement withAcid Stimulation” 2^(nd) edition by Leonard Kalfayan (PennWell 2008),SPE 129329, SPE 123869, SPE 121464, SPE 121803, SPE 121008, IPTC 10693,66564-PA, and the references contained therein.

In acid fracturing, an acidizing fluid is pumped into a carbonateformation at a sufficient pressure to cause fracturing of the formationand creating differential (non-uniform) etching fracture conductivity.Greater details, methodology, and exceptions can be found in “ProductionEnhancement with Acid Stimulation” 2^(nd) edition by Leonard Kalfayan(PennWell 2008), SPE 129329, SPE 123869, SPE 121464, SPE 121803, SPE121008, IPTC 10693, 66564-PA, and the references contained therein.

Matrix Diversion

Matrix treatments in conventional reservoirs can utilize diversion. Truematrix diversion does not apply, however, to ultra-low permeableformations.

For example, in subterranean treatments in conventional reservoirs, itis often desired to treat an interval of a subterranean formation havingsections of varying permeability, reservoir pressures and/or varyingdegrees of formation damage, and thus may accept varying amounts ofcertain treatment fluids. For example, low reservoir pressure in certainareas of a subterranean formation or a rock matrix or a proppant pack ofhigh permeability may permit that portion to accept larger amounts ofcertain treatment fluids. It may be difficult to obtain a uniformdistribution of the treatment fluid throughout the entire interval. Forinstance, the treatment fluid may preferentially enter portions of theinterval with low fluid flow resistance at the expense of portions ofthe interval with higher fluid flow resistance. In some instances, theseintervals with variable flow resistance may be water-producingintervals. This is different from diversion between different zones. SeeU.S. application Ser. No. 12/512,232, filed Jul. 30, 2009, entitled“Methods of Fluid Loss Control and Fluid Diversion in SubterraneanFormations,” which is incorporated by reference.

In addition, relative permeability modifiers (RPMs) can be consideredanother approach to matrix diversion.

Well Treatment—Hydraulic Fracturing

Hydraulic fracturing, sometimes referred to as fracturing or fracing, isa common stimulation treatment. A treatment fluid adapted for thispurpose is sometimes referred to as a fracturing fluid. The fracturingfluid is pumped at a sufficiently high flow rate and pressure into thewellbore and into the subterranean formation to create or enhance afracture in the subterranean formation. Creating a fracture means makinga new fracture in the formation. Enhancing a fracture means enlarging apre-existing fracture in the formation.

A frac pump is used for hydraulic fracturing. A frac pump is ahigh-pressure, high-volume pump. Typically, a frac pump is apositive-displacement reciprocating pump. The structure of such a pumpis resistant to the effects of pumping abrasive fluids, and the pump isconstructed of materials that are resistant to the effects of pumpingcorrosive fluids. Abrasive fluids are suspensions of hard, solidparticulates, such as sand. Corrosive fluids include, for example,acids. The fracturing fluid may be pumped down into the wellbore at highrates and pressures, for example, at a flow rate in excess of 50 barrelsper minute (2,100 U.S. gallons per minute) at a pressure in excess of5,000 pounds per square inch (“psi”). The pump rate and pressure of thefracturing fluid may be even higher, for example, flow rates in excessof 100 barrels per minute and pressures in excess of 10,000 psi arecommon.

Fracturing a subterranean formation often uses hundreds of thousands ofgallons of fracturing fluid or more. Further, it is often desirable tofracture more than one treatment zone of a well. Thus, a high volume offracturing fluids is often used in fracturing of a well, which meansthat a low-cost fracturing fluid is desirable. Because of the readyavailability and relative low cost of water compared to other liquids,among other considerations, a fracturing fluid is usually water-based.

The creation or extension of a fracture in hydraulic fracturing occurssuddenly. When this happens, the fracturing fluid suddenly has a fluidflow path through the fracture to flow more rapidly away from thewellbore, which may be detected as a change in pressure or fluid flowrate.

A newly-created or newly-extended fracture will tend to close togetherafter the pumping of the fracturing fluid is stopped. To prevent thefracture from closing, a material is usually placed in the fracture tokeep the fracture propped open and to provide higher fluid conductivitythan the matrix of the formation. A material used for this purpose isreferred to as a proppant.

A proppant is in the form of a solid particulate, which can be suspendedin the fracturing fluid, carried downhole, and deposited in the fractureto form a proppant pack. The proppant pack props the fracture in an opencondition while allowing fluid flow through the permeability of thepack. The proppant pack in the fracture provides a higher-permeabilityflow path for the oil or gas to reach the wellbore compared to thepermeability of the matrix of the surrounding subterranean formation.This higher-permeability flow path increases oil and gas production fromthe subterranean formation.

A particulate for use as a proppant is usually selected based on thecharacteristics of size range, crush strength, and solid stability inthe types of fluids that are encountered or used in wells. Preferably, aproppant should not melt, dissolve, or otherwise degrade from the solidstate under the downhole conditions.

The proppant is selected to be an appropriate size to prop open thefracture and bridge the fracture width expected to be created by thefracturing conditions and the fracturing fluid. If the proppant is toolarge, it will not easily pass into a fracture and will screenout tooearly. If the proppant is too small, it will not provide the fluidconductivity to enhance production. See, for example, McGuire andSikora, 1960. In the case of fracturing relatively permeable or eventight-gas reservoirs, a proppant pack should provide higher permeabilitythan the matrix of the formation. In the case of fracturing ultra-lowpermeable formations, such as shale formations, a proppant pack shouldprovide for higher permeability than the naturally occurring fracturesor other micro-fractures of the fracture complexity.

Appropriate sizes of particulate for use as a proppant are typically inthe range from about 8 to about 100 U.S. Standard Mesh. A typicalproppant is sand-sized, which geologically is defined as having alargest dimension ranging from about 0.06 millimeters up to about 2millimeters (mm). (The next smaller particle size class below sand sizedis silt, which is defined as having a largest dimension ranging fromless than about 0.06 mm down to about 0.004 mm.) As used herein,proppant does not mean or refer to suspended solids, silt, fines, orother types of insoluble solid particulate smaller than about 0.06 mm(about 230 U.S. Standard Mesh). Further, it does not mean or refer toparticulates larger than about 3 mm (about 7 U.S. Standard Mesh).

The proppant is sufficiently strong, that is, has a sufficientcompressive or crush resistance, to prop the fracture open without beingdeformed or crushed by the closure stress of the fracture in thesubterranean formation. For example, for a proppant material thatcrushes under closure stress, a 20/40 mesh proppant preferably has anAPI crush strength of at least 4,000 psi closure stress based on 10%crush fines according to procedure API RP-56, A 12/20 mesh proppantmaterial preferably has an API crush strength of at least 4,000 psiclosure stress based on 16% crush fines according to procedure APIRP-56. This performance is that of a medium crush-strength proppant,whereas a very high crush-strength proppant would have a crush-strengthof about 10,000 psi. In comparison, for example, a 100-mesh proppantmaterial for use in an ultra-low permeable formation such as shalepreferably has an API crush strength of at least 5,000 psi closurestress based on 6% crush fines. The higher the closing pressure of theformation of the fracturing application, the higher the strength ofproppant is needed. The closure stress depends on a number of factorsknown in the art, including the depth of the formation.

Further, a suitable proppant should be stable over time and not dissolvein fluids commonly encountered in a well environment. Preferably, aproppant material is selected that will not dissolve in water or crudeoil.

Suitable proppant materials include, but are not limited to, sand(silica), ground nut shells or fruit pits, sintered bauxite, glass,plastics, ceramic materials, processed wood, resin coated sand or groundnut shells or fruit pits or other composites, and any combination of theforegoing. Mixtures of different kinds or sizes of proppant can be usedas well. In conventional reservoirs, if sand is used, it commonly has amedian size anywhere within the range of about 20 to about 100 U.S.Standard Mesh. For a synthetic proppant, it commonly has a median sizeanywhere within the range of about 8 to about 100 U.S. Standard Mesh.

The concentration of proppant in the treatment fluid depends on thenature of the subterranean formation. As the nature of subterraneanformations differs widely, the concentration of proppant in thetreatment fluid may be in the range of from about 0.03 kilograms toabout 12 kilograms of proppant per liter of liquid phase (from about 0.1lb/gal to about 25 lb/gal).

Tip Screenout in Fracturing Permeable Formations

The conductivity of propped fractures depends on, among other things,fracture width and fracture permeability. The permeability can beestimated based on the size of the proppant. The width of a fracturedepends on the nature of the formation and the specific fracturingconditions.

In relatively permeable formations, it is often desirable to maximizethe length of the fractures created by hydraulic fracturing treatments,so that the surface area of the fractures, and therefore the areaserviced by the well, may be maximized. In certain frac-packingtreatments, particularly in weakly-consolidated highly-permeable sandformations, it may be more desirable to form short, wide fractures thatfeature high fracture conductivities.

One way of creating such short, wide fractures is with a tip screenout.In a tip screenout, the growth of the fracture length is arrested whenthe proppant concentration at the tip of the fracture becomes highlyconcentrated, typically due to fluid leak-off into the surroundingformation. In a fracture tip screenout, the proppant bridges the narrowgaps at the tip of the fracture and are packed into the fracture, thusrestricting flow to the fracture tip, which may terminate the extensionof the fracture into the formation, among other things, because thehydraulic pressure of the stimulation fluid may not be transmitted fromthe wellbore to the fracture tip. The concentrated proppant slurry plugsthe fracture and prevents additional lengthening of the fracture. Anyadditional pumping of the proppant slurry beyond this point causes thefracture to widen or balloon and packs the existing fracture length withadditional proppant. This results in a relatively short, wide fracturehaving both high fracture conductivity and a high proppantconcentration.

Being able to control the initiation of a fracture tip screenout may bean important aspect of a successful fracturing operation. Withoutcontrol of the fracture tip screenout, a fracture may not be packed withproppant as needed, e.g., to have the desired fracture width near thewellbore.

Conventionally, to initiate a fracture tip screenout, the flow rate ofthe fracturing fluid is reduced while increasing proppant concentrationtherein, with the anticipation that this combination will cause afracture tip screenout. Design features typically employed in situationsin which a tip screenout is desired often involve methods of ensuringthat fluid leak-off is high relative to the rate and amount of proppantinjection. This can be achieved in a number of ways, including, but notlimited to, using a small amount of pad fluid to initiate the fracture,using little or no fluid loss additive, using high proppantconcentrations earlier in the treatment, pumping more slowly during thefracturing operation, or some combination thereof. However, thismethodology does not consistently cause fracture tip screenouts. Whileincreasing the proppant concentration and decreasing the flow rate doesincrease the probability that a fracture tip screenout may occur, thismethodology assumes that there is one fracture taking all of the fluid.But, where there are competing fractures, the initiation of a fracturetip screenout may be difficult to control and/or predict usingconventional methodologies. Pressure transients collected by downholepressure gauges during frac-packing treatments indicate that tipscreenouts often do not occur when and where desired or intended.Instead, the fluid at the tip of the fracture often remains mobile, thefracture tip continues to grow throughout the treatment, and the desiredproppant concentration in the fracture is not reached. Because of this,the desired high fracture conductivity may not be obtained.

For example, in deviated wellbores, where only a portion of theperforations communicate with the dominant fracture that is beingextended (when using conventional technologies), fluid is lost (e.g.,leaking off) into other portions or fractures in the well besides thedominant fracture. Dependent upon the rate of fluid loss into theformation, these conventional methodologies may not successfullygenerate a tip screenout in the fracture.

Furthermore, the conventional methods cannot predict when the screenoutoccurs, and, therefore, while it is desirable for the proppant to bridgeat the tip of the fracture and pack therein, the bridging of theproppant and thus the screenout may occur anywhere in the fracture.Oftentimes, this may happen near the wellbore, before the highconcentration proppant reaches the fracture, causing an undesirablescreenout inside the well bore. If the screenout does not occur at thetip, and the fracture is not gradually filled with proppant afterwards,the fracture may not be packed with proppant as desired.

One method of inducing and controlling tip screenout includes pumping anannulus fluid into an annulus, between the subterranean formation and awork string disposed within a wellbore penetrating the subterraneanformation, at an annulus flow rate; and reducing the annulus flow ratebelow a fracture initiation flow point so that the fracture tipscreenout is initiated in the one or more fractures in the subterraneanformation. U.S. Pat. No. 7,237,612, issued Jul. 3, 2007, titled “Methodsof Initiating a fracture Tip Screenout” having for named inventors JimB. Surjaatmadja, Billy W. McDaniel, Mark Farabee, David Adams, and LoydEast, which is incorporated by reference.

Another method of inducing and controlling tip screenout during afrac-packing treatment comprising injecting a proppant slurry into asubterranean formation, wherein the proppant slurry comprises a proppantmaterial, a fracturing fluid, and degradable particulates and whereinthe degradable particulates physically interact with themselves and withthe proppant material to aid in inducing tip screenout. U.S. Pat. No.7,413,017, issued Aug. 19, 2008, titled “Methods and Compositions forInducing Tip-Screenouts in Frac-Packing Operations” having for namedinventors Philip D. Nguyen and Anne M. Culotta, which is incorporated byreference.

Tip screenout requires considerable fluid loss while at fracturingrates. This necessitates a high permeability formation and cannot occurin low permeability formations that have a matrix permeability less than1,000 microDarcy (equivalent to 1 milliDarcy), much less in ultra-lowpermeable formations that have a matrix permeability less than 1microDarcy (equivalent to 0.001 milliDarcy).

Well Treatment—Staged Fracturing and Zone Diversion

Multiple or staged fracturing involves fracturing two or more differentzones of a wellbore in succession. Staged hydraulic fracturingoperations are commonly performed from horizontal wellbores placed inshale gas reservoirs.

In the context of staged fracturing, diversion techniques are used todivert a fracturing fluid from one zone to a different zone. Diversiontechniques fall into two main categories: mechanical diversion andchemical diversion. Mechanical diversion includes the use of mechanicaldevices, such as ball sealers or packers, to isolate one zone fromanother and divert a treatment fluid to the desired zone. Chemicaldiversion includes the use of chemicals to divert a treatment fluid fromentering a zone in favor of entering a different zone.

In conventional methods of treating subterranean formations, once theless fluid flow-resistant zone of a subterranean formation has beentreated, that zone may be sealed off using a variety of techniques todivert treatment fluids to a more fluid flow-resistant zone of the well.Such techniques may have involved, among other things, the injection ofparticulates, foams, emulsions, plugs, packers, or blocking polymers(e.g., crosslinked aqueous gels) into the interval so as to plug offhigh-permeability portions of the subterranean formation once they havebeen treated, thereby diverting subsequently injected fluids to morefluid flow-resistant portions of the subterranean formation.

For example, near wellbore diversion is a near-wellbore treatment thatcauses a zone to greatly reduce or stop the taking of fluid so that thefluid is then diverted to enter another zone. This can be accomplished,for example, by plugging wellbore perforations or plugging anear-wellbore proppant pack. According to some techniques known in theart, diversion from one zone to another can be accomplished withoutstopping the pumping of one or more fracturing fluids into the well.

A fracturing stage includes pumping one or more fracturing fluids intothe treatment zone at a rate and pressure above the fracture pressure ofthe treatment zone. Designing a fracturing stage usually includesdetermining a designed total pumping time for the stage or determining adesigned total pumping volume of fracturing fluid for the fracturingstage. The tail end of a fracturing stage is the last portion of pumpingtime into the zone or the last portion of the volume of fracturing fluidpumped into the zone. This is usually about the last minute of totalpumping time or about the last wellbore volume of a fracturing fluid tobe pumped into the zone. The portion of pumping time or fracturing fluidvolume that is pumped before the tail end of a fracturing stage reachesinto a far-field region of the zone.

A person of skill in the art is able to plan each fracturing stage indetail, subject to unexpected or undesired early screenout or otherproblems that might be encountered in fracturing a well. A person ofskill in the art is able to determine the wellbore volume between thewellhead and the zone. In addition, a person of skill in the art is ableto determine the time within a few seconds in which a well fluid pumpedinto a well should take to reach a zone.

In addition to being designed in advance, the actual point at which afracturing fluid is diverted from a zone can be determined by a personof skill in the art, including based on observed changes in wellpressures or flow rates.

Well Treatment—Gravel Packing

A solid particulate also can be used for gravel packing operations.Gravel packing is commonly used as a sand-control method to preventproduction of formation sand from a poorly consolidated subterraneanformation. In gravel packing, a mechanical screen is placed in thewellbore and the surrounding annulus packed with a particulate of aspecific size designed to prevent the passage of formation sand. Theprimary objective is to stabilize the formation while causing minimalimpairment to well productivity.

The particulate used for this purpose is referred to as “gravel.” In theoil and gas field, and as used herein, the term “gravel” is refers torelatively large particles in the sand size classification, that is,particles ranging in diameter from about 0.1 mm up to about 2 mm.Generally, a particulate having the properties, including chemicalstability, of a low-strength proppant is used in gravel packing. Anexample of a commonly used gravel packing material is sand.

A screenout is a condition encountered during some gravel-packoperations wherein the treatment area cannot accept further packinggravel (larger sand). Under ideal conditions, this should signify thatthe entire void area has been successfully packed with the gravel.However, if screenout occurs earlier than expected in the treatment, itmay indicate an incomplete treatment and the presence of undesirablevoids within the treatment zone.

Increasing Viscosity of Fluid for Suspending Particulate

Various particulates can be employed in a fluid for use in a well or afluid can be used to help remove particulates from a well.

For example, during drilling, rock cuttings should be carried by thedrilling fluid and flowed out of the wellbore. The rock cuttingstypically have specific gravity greater than 2, which is much higherthan that of many drilling fluids.

Similarly, a proppant used in fracturing may have a much differentdensity than the fracturing fluid. For example, sand has a specificgravity of about 2.7, where water has a specific gravity of 1.0 atStandard Laboratory conditions of temperature and pressure. A proppanthaving a different density than water will tend to separate from watervery rapidly.

As many well fluids are water-based, partly for the purpose of helpingto suspend particulate of higher density, and for other reasons known inthe art, the density of the fluid used in a well can be increased byincluded highly water-soluble salts in the water, such as potassiumchloride. However, increasing the density of a well fluid will rarely besufficient to match the density of the particulate.

Increasing the viscosity of a well fluid can help prevent a particulatehaving a different specific gravity than an external phase of the fluidfrom quickly separating out of the external phase.

Emulsion for Increasing Viscosity

The internal-phase droplets of an emulsion disrupt streamlines andrequire more effort to get the same flow rate. Thus, an emulsion tendsto have a higher viscosity than the external phase of the emulsion wouldotherwise have by itself. This property of an emulsion can be used tohelp suspend a particulate material in an emulsion. This technique forincreasing the viscosity of a liquid can be used separately or incombination with other techniques for increasing the viscosity of afluid.

As used herein, to “break” an emulsion means to cause the creaming andcoalescence of emulsified drops of the internal dispersed phase so thatthey the internal phase separates out of the external phase. Breaking anemulsion can be accomplished mechanically (for example, in settlers,cyclones, or centrifuges) or with chemical additives to increase thesurface tension of the internal droplets.

Viscosity-Increasing Agent

A viscosity-increasing agent is sometimes referred to in the art as athickener, gelling agent, or suspending agent. There are several kindsof viscosity-increasing agents and related techniques for increasing theviscosity of a fluid.

In general, because of the high volume of fracturing fluid typicallyused in a fracturing operation, it is desirable to efficiently increasethe viscosity of fracturing fluids to the desired viscosity using aslittle viscosity-increasing agent as possible. In addition, relativelyinexpensive materials are preferred. Being able to use only a smallconcentration of the viscosity-increasing agent requires a lesser amountof the viscosity-increasing agent in order to achieve the desired fluidviscosity in a large volume of fracturing fluid.

Polymers for Increasing Viscosity

Certain kinds of polymers can be used to increase the viscosity of afluid. In general, the purpose of using a polymer is to increase theability of the fluid to suspend and carry a particulate material.Polymers for increasing the viscosity of a fluid are preferably solublein the external phase of a fluid. Polymers for increasing the viscosityof a fluid can be naturally occurring polymers such as polysaccharides,derivatives of naturally occurring polymers, or synthetic polymers.

Water-Soluble Polysaccharides or Derivatives for Increasing Viscosity

Fracturing fluids are usually water-based. Efficient and inexpensiveviscosity-increasing agents for water include certain classes ofwater-soluble polymers.

Water-soluble polysaccharides are often used to the extent of at least10 mg per liter in water at 25° C. More preferably, the water-solublepolymer is also used to the extent of at least 10 mg per liter in anaqueous sodium chloride solution of 32 grams sodium chloride per literof water at 25° C. As will be appreciated by a person of skill in theart, the solubility or dispersability in water of a certain kind ofpolymeric material may be dependent on the salinity or pH of the water.Accordingly, the salinity or pH of the water can be modified tofacilitate the solubility or dispersability of the water-solublepolymer. In some cases, the water-soluble polymer can be mixed with asurfactant to facilitate its solubility in the water or salt solutionutilized.

The water-soluble polymer can have an average molecular weight in therange of from about 50,000 to 20,000,000, most preferably from about100,000 to about 3,000,000.

Typical water-soluble polymers used in well treatments are water-solublepolysaccharides and water-soluble synthetic polymers (e.g.,polyacrylamide). The most common water-soluble polysaccharide employedin well treatments is guar and its derivatives.

A polysaccharide can be classified as being non-helical or helical (orrandom coil type) based on its solution structure in aqueous liquidmedia. Examples of non-helical polysaccharides include guar, guarderivatives, and cellulose derivatives. Examples of helicalpolysaccharides include xanthan, diutan, and scleroglucan, andderivatives of any of these.

As used herein, a “polysaccharide” can broadly include a modified orderivative polysaccharide. As used herein, “modified” or “derivative”means a compound or substance formed by a chemical process from a parentcompound or substance, wherein the chemical skeleton of the parentexists in the derivative. The chemical process preferably includes atmost a few chemical reaction steps, and more preferably only one or twochemical reaction steps. As used herein, a “chemical reaction step” is achemical reaction between two chemical reactant species to produce atleast one chemically different species from the reactants (regardless ofthe number of transient chemical species that may be formed during thereaction). An example of a chemical step is a substitution reaction.Substitution on a polymeric material may be partial or complete.

A guar derivative can be selected from the group consisting of, forexample, a carboxyalkyl derivative of guar, a hydroxyalkyl derivative ofguar, and any combination thereof. Preferably, the guar derivative isselected from the group consisting of carboxymethylguar,carboxymethylhydroxyethylguar, hydroxyethylguar,carboxymethylhydroxypropylguar, ethylcarboxymethylguar, andhydroxypropylmethylguar.

A cellulose derivative can be selected from the group consisting of, forexample, a carboxyalkyl derivative of cellulose, a hydroxyalkylderivative of cellulose, and any combination thereof. Preferably, thecellulose derivative is selected from the group consisting ofcarboxymethylcellulose, carboxymethylhydroxyethylcellulose,hydroxyethylcellulose, methylcellulose, ethylcellulose,ethylcarboxymethylcellulose, and hydroxypropylmethylcellulose.

Crosslinking of Polysaccharide to Increase Viscosity of a Fluid or Forma Gel

The viscosity of a fluid at a given concentration ofviscosity-increasing agent can be greatly increased by crosslinking theviscosity-increasing agent. A crosslinking agent, sometimes referred toas a crosslinker, can be used for this purpose. One example of acrosslinking agent is the borate ion. If a polysaccharide is crosslinkedto a sufficient extent, it can form a gel with water. Gel formation isbased on a number of factors including the particular polymer andconcentration thereof, the particular crosslinker and concentrationthereof, the degree of crosslinking, temperature, and a variety of otherfactors known to those of ordinary skill in the art.

A base gel is a fluid that includes a viscosity-increasing agent, suchas guar, but that excludes crosslinking agents. Typically, a base gel isa fluid that is mixed with another fluid containing a crosslinker,wherein the mixed fluid is adapted to form a gel after injectiondownhole at a desired time in a well treatment. A base gel can be used,for example, as the external phase of an emulsion.

Breaker for Polysaccharide or Crosslinked Polysaccharide

Drilling or treatment fluids also commonly include a breaker for apolysaccharide or crosslinked polysaccharide. In this context ofviscosity increase provided by a use of a polysaccharide, the term breakor breaker as used herein refers to a reduction in the viscosity of afluid or gel by some breaking of the polymer backbones or some breakingor reversing of the crosslinks between polymer molecules. No particularmechanism is necessarily implied by the term. A breaker for this purposecan be, for example, an acid, a base, an oxidizer, an enzyme, achelating agent for a metal crosslinker, an azo compound, or acombination of these. The acids, oxidizers, or enzymes can be in theform of delayed-release or encapsulated breakers.

Examples of such suitable breakers for treatment fluids of the presentinvention include, but are not limited to, sodium chlorites,hypochlorites, perborate, persulfates, and peroxides (including organicperoxides). Other suitable breakers include, but are not limited to,suitable acids and peroxide breakers, delinkers, as well as enzymes thatmay be effective in breaking viscosified treatment fluids. In somepreferred embodiments, the breaker may be citric acid, tetrasodium EDTA,ammonium persulfate, or cellulose enzymes. A breaker may be included ina treatment fluid of the present invention in an amount and formsufficient to achieve the desired viscosity reduction at a desired time.The breaker may be formulated to provide a delayed break, if desired.For example, a suitable breaker may be encapsulated if desired. Suitableencapsulation methods are known to those skilled in the art. Onesuitable encapsulation method involves coating the selected breaker in aporous material that allows for release of the breaker at a controlledrate. Another suitable encapsulation method that may be used involvescoating the chosen breakers with a material that will degrade whendownhole so as to release the breaker when desired. Resins that may besuitable include, but are not limited to, polymeric materials that willdegrade when downhole.

A treatment fluid can optionally comprise an activator or a retarder to,among other things, optimize the break rate provided by a breaker. Anyknown activator or retarder that is compatible with the particularbreaker used is suitable for use in the present invention. Examples ofsuch suitable activators include, but are not limited to, acidgenerating materials, chelated iron, copper, cobalt, and reducingsugars. Examples of suitable retarders include sodium thiosulfate,methanol, and diethylenetriamine.

In the case of a crosslinked viscosity-increasing agent, for example,one way to diminish the viscosity is by breaking the crosslinks. Forexample, the borate crosslinks in a borate-crosslinked gel can be brokenby lowering the pH of the fluid. At a pH above 8, the borate ion existsand is available to crosslink and cause gelling. At a lower pH, theborate ion reacts with proton and is not available for crosslinking,thus, an increase in viscosity due to borate crosslinking is reversible.

Viscosifying Surfactants (i.e. Viscoelastic Surfactants)

It should be understood that merely increasing the viscosity of a fluidmay only slow the settling or separation of distinct phases and does notnecessarily gel the fluid.

Certain viscosity-increasing agents can also help suspend a particulatematerial by increasing the elastic modulus of the fluid. The elasticmodulus is the measure of a substance's tendency to be deformednon-permanently when a force is applied to it. The elastic modulus of afluid, commonly referred to as G′, is a mathematical expression anddefined as the slope of a stress versus strain curve in the elasticdeformation region. G′ is expressed in units of pressure, for example,Pa (Pascals) or dynes/cm². As a point of reference, the elastic modulusof water is negligible and considered to be zero. An example of aviscosity-increasing agent that also increases the elastic modulus of afluid is a viscoelastic surfactant.

An example of a viscosity-increasing agent that is also capable ofincreasing the suspending capacity of a fluid is to use a viscoelasticsurfactant. As used herein, the term “viscoelastic surfactant” refers toa surfactant that imparts or is capable of imparting viscoelasticbehavior to a fluid due, at least in part, to the association ofsurfactant molecules to form viscosifying micelles. These viscoelasticsurfactants may be cationic, anionic, or amphoteric in nature. Theviscoelastic surfactants can comprise any number of different compounds,including methyl ester sulfonates (e.g., as described in U.S. patentapplication Ser. Nos. 11/058,660, 11/058,475, 11/058,612, and11/058,611, filed Feb. 15, 2005, the relevant disclosures of which areincorporated herein by reference), hydrolyzed keratin (e.g., asdescribed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,547,871, the relevant disclosure of whichis incorporated herein by reference), sulfosuccinates, taurates, amineoxides, ethoxylated amides, alkoxylated fatty acids, alkoxylatedalcohols (e.g., lauryl alcohol ethoxylate, ethoxylated nonyl phenol),ethoxylated fatty amines some of which are described in U.S. Pat. Nos.4,061,580, 4,324,669, and 4,215,001 the relevant disclosures of whichare incorporated herein by reference, ethoxylated alkyl amines (e.g.,cocoalkylamine ethoxylate), betaines, modified betaines,alkylamidobetaines (e.g., cocoamidopropyl betaine), quaternary ammoniumcompounds (e.g., trimethyltallowammonium chloride, trimethylcocoammoniumchloride), derivatives thereof, and combinations thereof.

Suitable viscoelastic surfactants may comprise mixtures of severaldifferent compounds, including but not limited to: mixtures of anammonium salt of an alkyl ether sulfate, a cocoamidopropyl betainesurfactant, a cocoamidopropyl dimethylamine oxide surfactant, sodiumchloride, and water; mixtures of an ammonium salt of an alkyl ethersulfate surfactant, a cocoamidopropyl hydroxysultaine surfactant, acocoamidopropyl dimethylamine oxide surfactant, sodium chloride, andwater; mixtures of an ethoxylated alcohol ether sulfate surfactant, analkyl or alkene amidopropyl betaine surfactant, and an alkyl or alkenedimethylamine oxide surfactant; aqueous solutions of an alpha-olefinicsulfonate surfactant and a betaine surfactant; and combinations thereof.Examples of suitable mixtures of an ethoxylated alcohol ether sulfatesurfactant, an alkyl or alkene amidopropyl betaine surfactant, and analkyl or alkene dimethylamine oxide surfactant are described in U.S.Pat. No. 6,063,738, the relevant disclosure of which is incorporatedherein by reference. Examples of suitable aqueous solutions of analpha-olefinic sulfonate surfactant and a betaine surfactant aredescribed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,879,699, the relevant disclosure of whichis incorporated herein by reference.

Examples of commercially-available viscoelastic surfactants suitable foruse in the present invention can include, but are not limited to,Mirataine BET-O 30™ (an oleamidopropyl betaine surfactant available fromRhodia Inc., Cranbury, N.J.), Aromox APA-T (amine oxide surfactantavailable from Akzo Nobel Chemicals, Chicago, Ill.), Ethoquad O/12 PG™(a fatty amine ethoxylate quat surfactant available from Akzo NobelChemicals, Chicago, Ill.), Ethomeen T/12™ (a fatty amine ethoxylatesurfactant available from Akzo Nobel Chemicals, Chicago, Ill.), EthomeenS/12™ fatty amine ethoxylate surfactant available from Akzo NobelChemicals, Chicago, Ill.), and Rewoteric AM TEG™ tallow dihydroxyethylbetaine amphoteric surfactant available from Degussa Corp., Parsippany,N.J.). See, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 7,727,935, issued Jun. 1, 2010,incorporated herein by reference.

Viscous Fluid Damage to Permeability

In the fracturing of conventional reservoirs having relatively highpermeability, viscous fluids used for carrying a proppant can damage thepermeability of the proppant pack or the subterranean formation near thefracture. For example, a fracturing fluid may be or include a gel thatis deposited in the fracture. The fluid may include surfactants thatleave unbroken micelles in the fracture or change the wettability of theformation in the region of the fracture. The higher the viscosity of thefracturing fluid, the more likely it is to damage the permeability of aproppant pack or formation.

Breakers are utilized in many treatments to mitigate fluid damage in thefracture. However, breakers and other treatments are subject tovariability of results, they add expense and complication to a fracturetreatment, and in all cases still leave at least some fluid damage inthe fracture.

In addition, the chemistry of fracturing gels, including thecrosslinking of gels, creates complications when designing fracturetreatments for a broad range of temperatures. After a fracturetreatment, fracturing fluid that flows back to the surface must bedisposed of, and the more fluid that is utilized in the treatment thegreater the disposal risk and expense. Accordingly, in the fracturing ofconventional reservoirs where the matrix permeability allows thefracturing fluid to enter the matrix of the formation rock, it is oftendesirable to minimize fluid loss into the formation.

Other Uses of Polymers in Well Fluids, for Example, as Friction Reducer

There are other uses for a polymers in a well fluid. For example, apolymer may be used as a friction reducer.

During the drilling, completion and stimulation of subterranean wells,well fluids are often pumped through tubular structures (e.g., pipes,coiled tubing, etc.). A considerable amount of energy may be lost due toturbulence in the treatment fluid. Because of these energy losses,additional horsepower may be necessary to achieve the desired treatment.To reduce these energy losses, certain polymers (referred to herein as“friction-reducing polymers”) have been included in these treatmentfluids.

For example, one type of hydraulic fracturing treatment that may utilizefriction-reducing polymers is commonly referred to as “high-rate waterfracturing” or “slick water fracturing.” As will be appreciated by thoseof ordinary skill in the art, fracturing fluids used in these high-ratewater-fracturing systems are generally not gels. As such, in high-ratewater fracturing, fluid velocity rather than viscosity is relied on forproppant transport. Additionally, while fluids used in high-rate waterfracturing may contain a friction-reducing polymer, thefriction-reducing polymer is generally included in the fracturing fluidin an amount sufficient to provide the desired friction reductionwithout gel formation. Gel formation would cause an undesirable increasein fluid viscosity that would result in increased pumping horsepowerrequirements. More preferably, a friction-reducing polymer is used in anamount that is sufficient to provide the desired friction reductionwithout appreciably viscosifying the fluid and usually without acrosslinker. As a result, the fracturing fluids used in these high-ratewater-fracturing operations generally have a lower viscosity thanconventional fracturing fluids. Typically, a well fluid in which apolymer is used as a friction reducer has a viscosity in the range ofabout 0.7 cP to about 10 cP. For the purposes of this disclosure,viscosities are measured at room temperature using a FANN® Model 35viscometer at 300 rpm with a ⅕ spring.

An example of a stimulation operation that may utilize friction reducingpolymers is hydraulic fracturing. Hydraulic fracturing is a processcommonly used to increase the flow of desirable fluids, such as oil andgas, from a portion of a subterranean formation. In hydraulicfracturing, a fracturing fluid may be introduced into the subterraneanformation at or above a pressure sufficient to create or enhance one ormore fractures in the formation. Enhancing a fracture may includeenlarging a pre-existing fracture in the formation. To reduce frictionalenergy losses within the fracturing fluid, friction-reducing polymersmay be included in the fracturing fluid. One type of hydraulicfracturing treatment that may utilize friction-reducing polymers iscommonly referred to as “high rate water fracturing” or “slick waterfracturing.” As will be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in theart, fracturing fluids used in these high rate water-fracturing systemsare generally not gels. As such, in high rate water fracturing, velocityrather than the fluid viscosity is relied on for proppant transport.Additionally, while fluids used in high rate water fracturing maycontain a friction-reducing polymer, the friction-reducing polymer isgenerally included in the fracturing fluid in an amount sufficient toprovide the desired friction reduction without gel formation. Gelformation would cause an undesirable increase in fluid viscosity thatwould, in return, result in increased horsepower requirements.

Suitable friction reducing polymers should reduce energy losses due toturbulence within the treatment fluid. Those of ordinary skill in theart will appreciate that the friction reducing polymer(s) included inthe treatment fluid should have a molecular weight sufficient to providea desired level of friction reduction. In general, polymers havinghigher molecular weights may be needed to provide a desirable level offriction reduction. By way of example, the average molecular weight ofsuitable friction reducing polymers may be at least about 2,500,000, asdetermined using intrinsic viscosities. In certain embodiments, theaverage molecular weight of suitable friction reducing polymers may bein the range of from about 7,500,000 to about 20,000,000. Those ofordinary skill in the art will recognize that friction-reducing polymershaving molecular weights outside the listed range may still provide somedegree of friction reduction. Typically, friction-reducing polymers arelinear and flexible, for example, having a persistence length <10 nm.

A wide variety of friction reducing polymers may be suitable for usewith the present invention. In certain embodiments, thefriction-reducing polymer may be a synthetic polymer. Additionally, forexample, the friction-reducing polymer may be an anionic polymer or acationic polymer, in accordance with embodiments of the presentinvention.

By way of example, suitable synthetic polymers may comprise any of avariety of monomeric units, including acrylamide, acrylic acid,2-acrylamido-2-methylpropane sulfonic acid, N,N-dimethylacrylamide,vinyl sulfonic acid, N-vinyl acetamide, N-vinyl formamide, itaconicacid, methacrylic acid, acrylic acid esters, methacrylic acid esters,quaternized aminoalkyl acrylate, such as a copolymer of acrylamide anddimethylaminoethyl acrylate quaternized with benzyl chloride, andmixtures thereof.

Examples of suitable friction reducing polymers are described in U.S.Pat. No. 6,784,141, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/156,356, U.S.patent application Ser. No. 11/300,614, and U.S. patent application Ser.No. 11/300,615, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein byreference. Combinations of suitable friction reducing polymers may alsobe suitable for use.

One example of a suitable anionic friction-reducing polymer is a polymercomprising acrylamide and acrylic acid. The acrylamide and acrylic acidmay be present in the polymer in any suitable concentration. An exampleof a suitable anionic friction reducing polymer may comprise acrylamidein an amount in the range of from about 5% to about 95% and acrylic acidin an amount in the range of from about 5% to about 95%. Another exampleof a suitable anionic friction-reducing polymer may comprise acrylamidein an amount in the range of from about 60% to about 90% by weight andacrylic acid in an amount in the range of from about 10% to about 40% byweight. Another example of a suitable anionic friction-reducing polymermay comprise acrylamide in an amount in the range of from about 80% toabout 90% by weight and acrylic acid in an amount in the range of fromabout 10% to about 20% by weight. Yet another example of a suitableanionic friction-reducing polymer may comprise acrylamide in an amountof about 85% by weight and acrylic acid in an amount of about 15% byweight. As previously mentioned, one or more additional monomers may beincluded in the anionic friction reducing polymer comprising acrylamideand acrylic acid. By way of example, the additional monomer(s) may bepresent in the anionic friction-reducing polymer in an amount up toabout 20% by weight of the polymer.

Suitable friction-reducing polymers may be in an acid form or in a saltform. As will be appreciated, a variety of salts may be prepared, forexample, by neutralizing the acid form of the acrylic acid monomer orthe 2-acrylamido-2-methylpropane sulfonic acid monomer. In addition, theacid form of the polymer may be neutralized by ions present in thetreatment fluid. As used herein, the term “polymer” is intended to referto the acid form of the friction-reducing polymer, as well as itsvarious salts.

As will be appreciated, the friction-reducing polymers suitable for usein the present technique may be prepared by any suitable technique. Forexample, the anionic friction-reducing polymer comprising acrylamide andacrylic acid may be prepared through polymerization of acrylamide andacrylic acid or through hydrolysis of polyacrylamide (e.g., partiallyhydrolyzed polyacrylamide). See, for example, U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,846,878and 7,806,185, which are incorporated by reference.

Spacer Fluids

A spacer fluid is a fluid used to physically separate onespecial-purpose fluid from another. Special-purpose fluids are typicallyprone to contamination, so a spacer fluid compatible with each is usedbetween the two. A spacer fluid is used when changing well fluids usedin a well. For example, a spacer fluid is used to change from a drillingfluid during drilling a well to a cement slurry during cementingoperations in the well. In case of an oil-based drilling fluid, itshould be kept separate from a water-based cementing fluid. In changingto the latter operation, a chemically treated water-based spacer fluidis usually used to separate the drilling fluid from the cement slurry.Another example is using a spacer fluid to separate two differenttreatment fluids.

Well Fluid Additives

A well fluid can contain additives that are commonly used in oil fieldapplications, as known to those skilled in the art. These include, butare not necessarily limited to, inorganic water-soluble salts, breakeraids, surfactants, oxygen scavengers, alcohols, scale inhibitors,corrosion inhibitors, fluid-loss additives, oxidizers, water controlagents (such as relative permeability modifiers), consolidating agents,proppant flowback control agents, conductivity enhancing agents, andbactericides.

Variations in Well Fluids over Time

Unless the specific context otherwise requires, a “well fluid” refers tothe specific properties and composition of a fluid at the time the fluidis being introduced into a well. In addition, it should be understoodthat, during the course of a well operation such as drilling, cementing,completion, or intervention, or during a specific treatment such asfluid-loss control, hydraulic fracturing, or a matrix treatment, thespecific properties and composition of a type of well fluid can bevaried or several different types of well fluids can be used. Forexample, the compositions can be varied to adjust viscosity orelasticity of the well fluids to accommodate changes in theconcentrations of proppant to be carried down to the subterraneanformation from initial packing of the fracture to tail-end packing. Itcan also be desirable to accommodate expected changes in temperaturesencountered by the well fluids during the course of the treatment. Byway of another example, it can be desirable to accommodate the longerduration that the first treatment fluid may need to maintain viscositybefore breaking compared to the shorter duration that a later-introducedtreatment fluid may need to maintain viscosity before breaking. Changesin concentration of the proppant, viscosity-increasing agent, or otheradditives in the various treatment fluids of a treatment operation canbe made in stepped changes of concentrations or ramped changes ofconcentrations.

Continuum Mechanics and Rheology

One of the purposes of identifying the physical state of a substance andmeasuring viscosity or other physical characteristics of a fluid is toestablish whether it is pumpable. In the context of oil and gasproduction, the pumpability of a fluid is with particular reference tothe ranges of physical conditions that may be encountered at a wellheadand with the types and sizes of pumps available to be used for pumpingfluids into a well. Another purpose is to determine what the physicalstate of the substance and its physical properties will be duringpumping through a wellbore and under other downhole conditions in thewell, including over time and changing temperatures, pressures, andshear rates. For example, in some applications, a well fluid forms orbecomes a higher viscosity fluid or gel under downhole conditions thatlater is “broken” back to a lower viscosity fluid.

Continuum mechanics is a branch of mechanics that deals with theanalysis of the kinematics and the mechanical behavior of materialsmodeled as a continuous mass on a large scale rather than as distinctparticles. Fluid mechanics is a branch of continuum mechanics thatstudies the physics of continuous materials that take the shape of theircontainer. Rheology is the study of the flow of matter: primarily in theliquid state, but also as “soft solids” or solids under conditions inwhich they respond with plastic flow rather than deforming elasticallyin response to an applied force. It applies to substances that have acomplex structure, such as fluid suspensions, gels, etc. The flow ofsuch substances cannot be fully characterized by a single value ofviscosity, which varies with temperature, pressure, and other factors.For example, ketchup can have its viscosity reduced by shaking (or otherforms of mechanical agitation) but water cannot.

Physical States (Phases)

The common physical states of matter include solid (fixed shape andvolume), liquid (fixed volume and shaped by a container), and gas(dispersing in a container). Distinctions among these physical statesare based on differences in intermolecular attractions. Solid is thestate in which intermolecular attractions keep the molecules in fixedspatial relationships. Liquid is the state in which intermolecularattractions keep molecules in proximity (low tendency to disperse), butdo not keep the molecules in fixed relationships. Gas is that state inwhich the molecules are comparatively separated and intermolecularattractions have relatively little effect on their respective motions(high tendency to disperse).

In addition, as used herein, a solid includes a plastic material, thatis, a material that has plasticity. Plasticity describes the deformationof a material undergoing non-reversible changes of shape in response toapplied forces.

As used herein, “phase” is used in the same sense as physical state,regardless of geometric extent of the phase or size of a particle.

The physical state of a substance is based on thermodynamics.Thermodynamics is the science of energy conversion involving heat,mechanical work, and other forms of energy. It studies and interrelatesvariables, such as temperature, volume, pressure, and friction, whichdescribe physical, thermodynamic systems.

As used herein, if not otherwise specifically stated, the physical state(phase) or other physical properties of a material are determined at atemperature of 77° F. (25° C.) and a pressure of 1 atmosphere (StandardLaboratory Conditions) and no applied deformation force or shear (thatis, not other such force than that of natural gravity).

Particles

As used herein, a “particle” refers a body having a finite mass andsufficient cohesion such that it can be considered as an entity buthaving relatively small dimensions. As used herein, a particle can be ofany size ranging from molecular scale particles to macroscopicparticles, depending on context. A particle can be in any physicalstate. For example, a particle of a substance in a solid state can be assmall as a few molecules on the scale of nanometers up to a largeparticle on the scale of a few millimeters, such as large grains ofsand. Similarly, a particle of a substance in a liquid state can be assmall as a few molecules on the scale of nanometers or a large drop onthe scale of a few millimeters. A particle of a substance in a gas stateis a single atom or molecule that is separated from other atoms ormolecules such that intermolecular attractions have relatively littleeffect on their respective motions.

Particulate

As used herein, “particulate” or “particulate material” refers to matterin the physical form of distinct particles. A particulate is a groupingof particles based on common characteristics, including chemicalcomposition and particle size range, particle size distribution, ormedian particle size. As used herein, a particulate is a grouping ofparticles having similar chemical composition and particle size rangesanywhere in the range of about 1 micrometer (e.g., microscopic clay orsilt particles) to about 3 millimeters (e.g., large grains of sand).

A particulate will have a particle size distribution (“PSD”). As usedherein, “the size” of a particulate can be determined by methods knownto persons skilled in the art.

Solid Particulate

A particulate can be of solid or liquid particles. As used herein,however, unless the context otherwise requires, particulate refers to asolid particulate. Of course, a solid particulate is a particulate ofparticles that are in the solid physical state, that is, the constituentatoms, ions, or molecules are sufficiently restricted in their relativemovement to result in a fixed shape for each of the particles.

One way to measure the approximate particle size distribution of a solidparticulate is with graded screens. A solid particulate material willpass through some specific mesh (that is, have a maximum size; largerpieces will not fit through this mesh) but will be retained by somespecific tighter mesh (that is, a minimum size; pieces smaller than thiswill pass through the mesh). This type of description establishes arange of particle sizes. A “+” before the mesh size indicates theparticles are retained by the sieve, while a “−” before the mesh sizeindicates the particles pass through the sieve. For example, −70/+140means that 90% or more of the particles will have mesh sizes between thetwo values.

Particulate materials are sometimes described by a single mesh size, forexample, 100 U.S. Standard mesh. If not otherwise stated, a reference toa single particle size means about the mid-point of the industryaccepted mesh size range for the particulate.

Particulate smaller than about 400 U.S. Standard Mesh is usuallymeasured or separated according to other methods because small forcessuch as electrostatic forces can interfere with separating tinyparticulate sizes using a wire mesh.

Udden-Wentworth Scale for Particulate Sediments

The most commonly-used grade scale for classifying the diameters ofsediments in geology is the Udden-Wentworth scale. According to thisscale, a solid particulate having particles smaller than 2 mm indiameter is classified as sand, silt, or clay. Sand is a detrital grainbetween 2 mm (equivalent to 2,000 micrometers) and 0.0625 mm (equivalentto 62.5 micrometers) in diameter. (Sand is also a term sometimes used torefer to quartz grains or for sandstone.) Silt refers to particulatebetween 74 micrometers (equivalent to about −200 U.S. Standard mesh) andabout 2 micrometers. Clay is a particulate smaller than 0.0039 mm(equivalent to 3.9 μm).

Dispersions

A substance can have more than one phase. A dispersion is a system inwhich particles of a substance of one state are dispersed in anothersubstance of a different composition or physical state. In addition,phases can be nested. If a substance has more than one phase, the mostexternal phase is referred to as the continuous phase of the substanceas a whole, regardless of the number of different internal phases ornested phases.

A dispersion can be classified a number of different ways, includingbased on the size of the dispersed particles, the uniformity or lack ofuniformity of the dispersion, whether or not precipitation occurs, andthe presence of Brownian motion. For example, a dispersion can beconsidered to be homogeneous or heterogeneous based on being a solutionor not, and if not a solution, based on the size of the dispersedparticles (which can refer to droplet size in the case of a dispersedliquid phase).

Classification of Dispersions: Homogeneous and Heterogeneous

A dispersion is considered to be homogeneous if the dispersed particlesare dissolved in solution or the particles are less than about 1nanometer in size.

A solution is a special type of homogeneous mixture. Solvation is theprocess of attraction and association of molecules of a solvent withmolecules or ions of a solute. A solution is homogeneous because theratio of solute to solvent is the same throughout the solution andbecause solute will never settle out of solution, even under powerfulcentrifugation. This is due to intermolecular attraction between thesolvent and the solute. An aqueous solution, for example, saltwater, isa homogenous solution in which water is the solvent and salt is thesolute.

Even if not dissolved, a dispersion is considered to be homogeneous ifthe dispersed particles are less than about 1 nanometer in size.

A dispersion is considered to be heterogeneous if the dispersedparticles are not dissolved or are greater than about 1 nanometer insize. (For reference, the diameter of a molecule of toluene is about 1nm).

Heterogeneous dispersions can have gas, liquid, or solid as an externalphase. An example of a suspension of solid particulate dispersed in agas phase would be an aerosol, such as smoke. In case thedispersed-phase particles are liquid in an external phase that isanother liquid, this kind of heterogeneous dispersion is moreparticularly referred to as an emulsion. Suspensions and emulsions arecommonly used as well fluids.

Classification of Heterogeneous Dispersions: Colloids and Suspensions

Heterogeneous dispersions can be further classified based on thedispersed particle size.

A heterogeneous dispersion is a “colloid” where the dispersed particlesrange up to about 1 micrometer (1,000 nanometers) in size. Typically,the dispersed particles of a colloid have a diameter of between about 5to about 200 nanometers. Such particles are normally invisible to anoptical microscope, though their presence can be confirmed with the useof an ultramicroscope or an electron microscope. In the cases where theexternal phase of a dispersion is a liquid, for a colloidal fluid thedispersed particles are so small that they do not settle.

A heterogeneous dispersion is a “suspension” where the dispersedparticles are larger than about 1 micrometer. Such particles can be seenwith a microscope, or if larger than about 100 micrometers (0.1 mm),with the unaided human eye. Unlike colloids, however, the dispersedparticles of a suspension in a liquid external phase may eventuallyseparate on standing, e.g., settle in cases where the particles have ahigher density than the liquid phase. Suspensions having a liquidexternal phase are essentially unstable from a thermodynamic point ofview; however, they can be kinetically stable over a long perioddepending on temperature and other conditions.

Gel and Deformation

The substance of a gel is a colloidal dispersion. A gel is formed by anetwork of interconnected molecules, such as of a crosslinked polymer orof micelles, which at the molecular level are attracted to molecules inliquid form. The network gives a gel phase its structure (apparent yieldpoint) and contributes to stickiness (tack). By weight, the substance ofgels is mostly liquid, yet they behave like solids due to thethree-dimensional network with the liquid. At the molecular level, a gelis a dispersion in which the network of molecules is continuous and theliquid is discontinuous.

A gel is a semi-solid, jelly-like state or phase that can haveproperties ranging from soft and weak to hard and tough. Shearingstresses below a certain finite value fail to produce permanentdeformation. The minimum shear stress which will produce permanentdeformation is known as the shear or gel strength of the gel.

A gel is considered to be a single phase because the intermolecularattractions between the molecules of the network and the molecules ofthe liquid contribute to its semi-solid, jelly-like properties.

Fluid and Apparent Viscosity

The substance of a fluid can be a single chemical substance or adispersion. In general, a fluid is an amorphous substance that is or hasa continuous phase of particles that are smaller than about 1 micrometerthat tends to flow and to conform to the outline of its container.

Examples of fluids are gases and liquids. A gas (in the sense of aphysical state) refers to an amorphous substance that has a hightendency to disperse (at the molecular level) and a relatively highcompressibility. A liquid refers to an amorphous substance that haslittle tendency to disperse (at the molecular level) and relatively highincompressibility. The tendency to disperse is related to IntermolecularForces (also known as van der Waal's Forces). (A continuous mass of aparticulate, e.g., a powder or sand, can tend to flow as a fluiddepending on many factors such as particle size distribution, particleshape distribution, the proportion and nature of any wetting liquid orother surface coating on the particles, and many other variables;nevertheless, as used herein, a fluid does not refer to a continuousmass of particulate. The sizes of the solid particles of a mass of aparticulate are too large to be appreciably affected by the range ofIntermolecular Forces.)

Viscosity is the resistance of a fluid to flow. In everyday terms,viscosity is “thickness” or “internal friction.” Thus, pure water is“thin,” having a relatively low viscosity whereas honey is “thick,”having a relatively higher viscosity. Put simply, the less viscous thefluid is, the greater its ease of movement (fluidity). More precisely,viscosity is defined as the ratio of shear stress to shear rate.

A Newtonian fluid (named after Isaac Newton) is a fluid for which stressversus strain rate curve is linear and passes through the origin. Theconstant of proportionality is known as the viscosity. Examples ofNewtonian fluids include water and most gases. Newton's law of viscosityis an approximation that holds for some substances but not others.

Non-Newtonian fluids exhibit a more complicated relationship betweenshear stress and velocity gradient (i.e., shear rate) than simplelinearity. Thus, there exist a number of forms of non-Newtonian fluids.Shear thickening fluids have an apparent viscosity that increases withthe rate of shear. Shear thinning fluids have a viscosity that decreaseswith the rate of shear. Thixotropic fluids become less viscous over timewhen shaken, agitated, or otherwise stressed. Rheopectic fluids becomemore viscous over time when shaken, agitated, or otherwise stressed. ABingham plastic is a material that behaves as a solid at low stressesbut flows as a viscous fluid at high stresses.

Most well fluids are non-Newtonian fluids. Accordingly, the apparentviscosity of a fluid applies only under a particular set of conditionsincluding shear stress versus shear rate, which must be specified orunderstood from the context. In the oilfield and as used herein, unlessthe context otherwise requires it is understood that a reference toviscosity is actually a reference to an apparent viscosity. Apparentviscosity is commonly expressed in units of centipoise (“cP”).

Like other physical properties, the viscosity of a Newtonian fluid orthe apparent viscosity of a non-Newtonian fluid is highly dependent onthe physical conditions, primarily temperature and pressure.Accordingly, unless otherwise stated, the viscosity or apparentviscosity of a fluid is measured under Standard Laboratory Conditions.

There are numerous ways of measuring and modeling viscous properties,and new developments continue to be made. The methods depend on the typeof fluid for which viscosity is being measured. A typical method forquality assurance or quality control (QA/QC) purposes uses a couettedevice, such as a Fann Model 50 viscometer, that measures viscosity as afunction of time, temperature, and shear rate. The viscosity-measuringinstrument can be calibrated using standard viscosity silicone oils orother standard viscosity fluids.

Due to the geometry of most common viscosity-measuring devices, however,solid particulate, such as proppant or gravel used in certain welltreatments, would interfere with the measurement on some types ofmeasuring devices. Therefore, the viscosity of a fluid containing suchsolid particulate is usually inferred and estimated by measuring theviscosity of a test fluid that is similar to the fracturing fluidwithout any proppant included. However, as suspended particles (whichcan be solid, gel, liquid, or bubbles of gas) usually affect theviscosity of a fluid, the actual viscosity of a suspension is usuallysomewhat different from that of the continuous phase.

Another example of a method of measuring the viscosity of certain fluidsthat have suspended proppant uses a Proppant Transport Measuring Device(“PTMD”), which is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 7,392,842, issued Jul. 1,2008 and in SPE 115298. The PTMD instrument is preferably calibratedagainst a more conventional instrument, for example, against a FannModel 50 viscometer.

Other examples of methods of measuring the viscosity of a fluid include:(1) Tonmukayakul. N. Bryant, J. E. Talbot, M. S, and Morris, J. F.,“Dynamic and steady shear properties of reversible cross-linked guarsolution and their effects on particle settling behavior”, The XVthInternational Congress on Rheology, Monterey, Calif., 3-8 Aug. 2008.American Institute of Physic Conference Proceedings 1027ISBN:978-0-7354-0549-3; (2) Tonmukayakul N. Bryant, J. E. and Morris, J.F., “Experimental investigation of the sedimentation behavior ofconcentrated suspension in non-Newtonian fluids under simple shearflows”, 82nd Annual Meeting, The Society of Rheology, Santa Fe, N. Mex.,Oct. 24-28, 2010; (3) Tonmukayakul N. and Morris, J. F., “Sedimentationof Particles in Viscoelastic Fluids Under Imposed Shear Conditions,” J.Rheol, 2011 (in press); (4) Tonmukayakul, N., Morris, J. E., Prud'homme,R. E. “Method for estimating proppant transport and suspendability ofviscoelastic liquids” US Application filed on May 17, 2010, U.S.application Ser. No. 12/722,493 and it was filed on Mar. 11, 2010; and(5) Tonmukayakul N. and Morris, J. F., “Spreading Front and ParticlesAlignment in Viscoelastic Fluids,” Physical Review E, 2011 (in press).

Foams

A foam is fluid having a liquid external phase that includes adispersion of undissolved gas bubbles that foam the liquid, usually withthe aid of a chemical (a foaming agent) in the liquid phase to achievestability.

Any suitable gas may be used for foaming, including nitrogen, carbondioxide, air, or methane. A foamed treatment fluid may be desirable to,among other things, reduce the amount of fluid that is required in awater sensitive subterranean formation, to reduce fluid loss in theformation, and/or to provide enhanced proppant suspension. In examplesof such embodiments, the gas may be present in the range of from about5% to about 98% by volume of the treatment fluid, and more preferably inthe range of from about 20% to about 80% by volume of the treatmentfluid. The amount of gas to incorporate in the fluid may be affected bymany factors including the viscosity of the fluid and the bottom holetemperatures and pressures involved in a particular application. One ofordinary skill in the art, with the benefit of this disclosure, willrecognize how much gas, if any, to incorporate into a foamed treatmentfluid.

In those embodiments where it is desirable to foam the treatment fluidsof the present invention, surfactants such as HY-CLEAN (HC-2)surface-active suspending agent or AQF-2 additive, both commerciallyavailable from Halliburton Energy Services, Inc., of Duncan, Okla., maybe used. Additional examples of foaming agents that may be used to foamand stabilize the treatment fluids of this invention include, but arenot limited to, betaines, amine oxides, methyl ester sulfonates,alkylamidobetaines such as cocoamidopropyl betaine, alpha-olefinsulfonate, trimethyltallowammonium chloride, C8 to C22 alkylethoxylatesulfate and trimethylcocoammonium chloride. Other suitable foamingagents and foam stabilizing agents may be included as well, which willbe known to those skilled in the art with the benefit of thisdisclosure.

Emulsions

An emulsion is a fluid including a dispersion of immiscible liquidparticles in an external liquid phase. In addition, the proportion ofthe external and internal phases is above the solubility of either inthe other. A chemical (an emulsifier or emulsifying agent) can beincluded to reduce the interfacial tension between the two immiscibleliquids to help with stability against coalescing of the internal liquidphase.

An emulsion can be an oil-in-water (o/w) type or water-in-oil (w/o)type. A water-in-oil emulsion is sometimes referred to as an invertemulsion. In the context of an emulsion, the “water” phase refers towater or an aqueous solution and the “oil” phase refers to any non-polarorganic liquid, such as petroleum, kerosene, or synthetic oil.

It should be understood that multiple emulsions are possible, which aresometimes referred to as nested emulsions. Multiple emulsions arecomplex polydispersed systems where both oil-in-water and water-in-oilemulsions exist simultaneously in the fluid, wherein the oil-in-wateremulsion is stabilized by a lipophilic surfactant and the water-in-oilemulsion is stabilized by a hydrophilic surfactant. These includewater-in-oil-in-water (w/o/w) and oil-in-water-in-oil (o/w/o) typemultiple emulsions. Even more complex polydispersed systems arepossible. Multiple emulsions can be formed, for example, by dispersing awater-in-oil emulsion in water or an aqueous solution, or by dispersingan oil-in-water emulsion in oil.

Classification of Fluids or Gels: Water-Based or Oil-Based

As used herein, “water-based” regarding a fluid or gel means that wateror an aqueous solution is the dominant material by weight of thecontinuous phase of the substance. In contrast, “oil-based” means thatoil is the dominant material by weight of the continuous phase of thesubstance as a whole.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

Methods of increasing the fracture complexity in a treatment zone of asubterranean formation are provided. The subterranean formation ischaracterized by having a matrix permeability less than 1.0 microDarcy.

According to an embodiment of the invention, methods include the step ofpumping one or more fracturing fluids into a far-field region of atreatment zone of the subterranean formation at a rate and pressureabove the fracture pressure of the treatment zone. A first fracturingfluid of the one or more fracturing fluids comprises a first solidparticulate, wherein: (a) the first solid particulate comprises a firstparticle size range effective for bridging the pore throats of aproppant pack previously formed or to be formed in the far-field regionof the treatment zone; (b) the first solid particulate is in aninsufficient amount in the first fracturing fluid to increase the packedvolume fraction of any region of the proppant pack to greater than 73%;and (c) the first solid particulate comprises a degradable material.

According to another embodiment of the invention, methods include thestep of pumping two or more fracturing fluids into the treatment zone ata rate and pressure above the fracture pressure of the treatment zonefor a total pumping volume greater than 2 wellbore volumes, wherein: (a)a first fracturing fluid of the two or more fracturing fluids is pumpedinto the treatment zone at least before the last 2 wellbore volumes ofthe total pumping volume, wherein the first fracturing fluid comprises aproppant, wherein the first fracturing fluid does not include a firstsolid particulate; and (b) a second fracturing fluid of the two or morefracturing fluids is pumped into the treatment zone after the firstfracturing fluid is pumped into the treatment zone but at least beforethe last 2 wellbore volumes of the total pumping volume, wherein thesecond fracturing fluid comprises the first solid particulate. The firstsolid particulate comprises a first particle size range effective forbridging the pore throats of a proppant pack formed in the treatmentzone by the proppant of the first fracturing fluid, and the first solidparticulate is degradable.

According to another embodiment of the invention for use in a remedialapplication, methods include the step of pumping one or more fracturingfluids into a far-field region of the treatment zone of the subterraneanformation at a rate and pressure above the fracture pressure of thetreatment zone. A first fracturing fluid of the one or more fracturingfluids comprises a first solid particulate, wherein: (a) the first solidparticulate comprises a first particle size range effective for bridgingthe pore throats of a proppant pack previously formed in the far-fieldregion of the treatment zone; and (b) the first solid particulatecomprises a degradable material.

As will be appreciated by a person of skill in the art, the methodsaccording to the invention can have application in various kindsoperations involved in the production of oil and gas, includingdrilling, completion, and intervention.

The features and advantages of the present invention will be apparent tothose skilled in the art. While numerous changes may be made by thoseskilled in the art, such changes are within the spirit of the invention.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING

The accompanying drawing is incorporated into the specification to helpillustrate examples according to the presently most-preferred embodimentof the invention.

FIG. 1 is a bar chart of the particle size distribution for an exampleof a solid particulate having particle sizes all less than 50 U.S. Mesh,which particulate is suitable for use in bridging the pore throats of aproppant pack formed of 100 U.S. Standard Mesh size proppant. More than50% by weight of the particulate has a particle size distribution of−50/+200 U.S. Mesh. This particulate includes a tail-end size range ofthe particulate having particles sizes less than 200 U.S. Standard mesh.The particulate size distributions were determined by graded screening.

FIG. 2 is a graph of the particle size distribution for the same examplematerial of FIG. 1 but as measured with the MASTERSIZER® instrument formeasuring particle size distributions.

FIG. 3 is a graph of the permeability measurements of a laboratoryexperiment illustrating the effectiveness of temporary reduction of thepermeability of a 100 U.S. Standard Mesh proppant pack with 5% w/wdegradable particles having a particle size distributions as shown inFIGS. 1 and 2.

FIG. 4 is a graph of the general relationship between the weight percentof the degradable particles mixed with a 100 U.S. Standard Mesh proppantpack and the packed volume fraction when the mixed particles are packed.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PRESENTLY PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS AND BEST MODEGeneral Definitions and Usages

As used herein, the words “comprise,” “have,” “include,” and allgrammatical variations thereof are each intended to have an open,non-limiting meaning that does not exclude additional elements or steps.

As used herein, if not otherwise specifically stated, the physical stateof a substance (or mixture of substances) and other physical propertiesare determined at a temperature of 77° F. (25° C.) and a pressure of 1atmosphere (Standard Laboratory Conditions) under no shear.

As used herein, if not otherwise specifically stated, a material isconsidered to be “soluble” in a liquid if at least 10 grams of thematerial can be dissolved in one liter of the liquid when tested at 77°F. and 1 atmosphere pressure for 2 hours and considered to be“insoluble” if less soluble than this. In addition, as used. herein, amaterial is “dissolvable” if itself or its hydrated product or productsis or are “soluble.” As will be appreciated by a person of skill in theart, the solubility in water of a certain material may be dependent onthe salinity, pH, or other additives in the water. Accordingly, thesalinity, pH, additive selection of the water can be modified tofacilitate the solubility in aqueous solution.

Unless otherwise specified, any ratio or percentage means by weight.

As used herein, the phrase “by weight of the water” means the weight ofthe water of the continuous phase of the fluid as a whole without theweight of any proppant, viscosity-increasing agent, dissolved salt, orother materials or additives that may be present in the water.

Unless otherwise specified, any doubt regarding whether units are inU.S. or Imperial units, where there is any difference U.S. units areintended herein. For example, “gal/Mgal” means U.S. gallons per thousandU.S. gallons.

The micrometer (μm) may sometimes referred to herein as a micron.

As used herein, “first,” “second,” or “third” may be arbitrarilyassigned and are merely intended to differentiate between two or morefluids, aqueous solutions, etc., as the case may be, that may be usedaccording to the invention. Accordingly, it is to be understood that themere use of the term “first” does not require that there be any“second,” and the mere use of the word “second” does not require thatthere by any “third,” etc. Further, it is to be understood that the mereuse of the term “first” does not require that the element or step be thevery first in any sequence, merely that it is at least one of theelements or steps. Similarly, the mere use of the terms “first” and“second” does not necessarily require any sequence. Accordingly, themere use of such terms does not exclude intervening elements or stepsbetween the “first” and “second” elements or steps, etc.

Unless otherwise specified, as used herein, the apparent viscosity of afluid (excluding any solid particulate) is measured with a Fann Model 50type viscometer at a shear rate of 40 l/s and at 77° F. (25° C.) and apressure of 1 atmosphere. For reference, the viscosity of pure water isabout 1 cP. As used herein, a material is considered to be a pumpablefluid if it has an apparent viscosity less than 5,000 cP.

Unless otherwise specified, “about” regarding a number or measurementmeans within 10% of the number or measurement.

Ultra-Low Permeability Formations

In general, the present invention is directed to increasing fracturecomplexity in ultra-low permeable formations such as a shale reservoir(which is sometimes referred to in the art as a shale play). As usedherein, an ultra-low permeable formation has a matrix permeability lessthan about 1 microDarcy.

Fracture Complexity

Ultra-low permeable formations tend to have a naturally occurringnetwork of multiple interconnected micro sized fractures. In addition,ultra-low permeable formations can be fractured to create or increasethe complexity of such multiple interconnected fractures. The fracturecomplexity is sometimes referred to in the art as a fracture network.

Fracturing Ultra-Low Permeable Formations

Ultra-low permeable formations are usually fractured with water-basedfluids having little viscosity and suspending relatively lowconcentrations of proppant. The size of the proppant is sized to beappropriate for the fracture complexity of such a formation, which ismuch smaller than used for fracturing higher permeability formationssuch as sandstone or even tight gas reservoirs. These kinds offracturing treatments are sometimes referred to as water-frac orslic-frac. The overall purpose is to increase or enhance the fracturecomplexity of such a formation to allow the gas to be produced.

Although the fractures of the fracture network are very small comparedto fractures formed in higher permeability formations, they should stillbe propped open. According to the invention, it is desirable totemporarily plug the proppant pack in the fracture complexity to forceadditional fracturing fluid to increase the fracture complexity. Afterincreasing the fracture complexity, it is desirable to re-open theproppant pack to allow the production of hydrocarbon from all thefracture complexity in the zone.

Matrix Permeability

As used herein, “matrix permeability” refers to the permeability of thematrix of the formation regardless of the fractures or microfractures ofany major fractures or fracture network. Methods of measuring matrixpermeability are known in the art. For example, one reference discloses:“Three laboratory methods were developed to measure matrix gaspermeability (Km) of Devonian shale cores and drill cuttings at nativewater saturations. The first method uses pulse pressure testing of coreplugs with helium. The second, new method uses pulse pressure testing ofcore chips or drill cuttings with helium. These methods gave comparableresults on 23 companion shale samples from two wells, with Km=0.2 to19×10⁻⁸ md. The third, new method uses degassibility of core plugs withhelium and methane, and yielded Km higher by a factor of 3 to 10. Mostof the core plugs tested showed multiple microfractures that remain openat reservoir stress, and these dominate conventional flow tests. Thesemicrofractures are parallel to bedding, are coring induced, and are notpresent in the reservoir. Knowledge of Km is important in computersimulation modeling of long-term Devonian shale gas production, and hasbeen a key to understanding the nature of the natural fracture networkpresent in the reservoir.” “Matrix Permeability Measurement of GasProductive Shales”; D. L. Luffel, ResTech Houston; C. W. Hopkins, S. A.Holditch & Assocs. Inc.; and P. D. Schettler Jr., Juniata College; SPE26633.

Stimulated Rock Volume

Stimulated rock volume is a term used in the art regarding thefracturing of shale or other ultra-low permeability reservoirs.“Ultra-low permeability shale reservoirs require a large fracturenetwork to maximize well performance. Microseismic fracture mapping hasshown that large fracture networks can be generated in many shalereservoirs. In conventional reservoirs and tight gas sands, single-planefracture half-length and conductivity are the key drivers forstimulation performance. In shale reservoirs, where complex networkstructures in multiple planes are created, the concept of a singlefracture half-length and conductivity are insufficient to describestimulation performance. This is the reason for the concept of usingstimulated reservoir volume as a correlation parameter for wellperformance. The size of the created fracture network can beapproximated as the 3-D volume (Stimulated Reservoir Volume or SRV) ofthe microseismic event cloud.” Title: “What is Stimulated Rock Volume?”Authors: M. J. Mayerhofer, E. P. Lolon, N. R. Warpinski, C. L. Cipolla,and D. Walser, Pinnacle Technologies, and C. M. Rightmire, Forrest A.Garb and Associates. Source: Society of Petroleum Engineers, “SPE ShaleGas Production Conference, 16-18 Nov. 2008, Fort Worth, Tex., USA.” SPE119890.

Desired Objectives of the Invention

Preferably, the degradable solid particulate is selected to be effectivefor reducing the permeability of the proppant pack in the fracturecomplexity of the treatment zone of an ultra-low permeable subterraneanformation. The purpose is to cause the proppant pack to have a lowerflow capacity than unplugged small fractures and lower than a proppantfilled fracture, which causing an increase in fracture complexity ratherthan extending fracture planes during the fracturing stage. This favorsincreasing the fracture complexity beyond the near-wellbore region ofthe treatment zone. The creation of increasing complexity is preferablyconfirmed with microseismic techniques as known and being currentlyfurther developed in the art. The penetration is desired to extenddeeper into the zone than in the near well-bore region.

As used herein, the far-field region of a zone is considered the matrixof rock that is at least 5 feet from the wellbore. More preferably, themethods according to the invention penetrate into the matrix of rock atleast 10 feet from the wellbore. In some embodiments, over 50 feet fromthe wellbore is preferred.

The purpose of this invention is not diversion of fracturing fluidsbetween treatment zones. In addition, the purpose of this invention isnot to use the degradable particulate to bridge or obstruct pore throatsin smaller fractures that may be perpendicular to the one or moredominant fractures being formed in the formation. Moreover, the purposeof this invention is not low damage of the formation. Rather, a purposeof the present inventions is to select a particulate to bridge porethroats of a proppant pack in an ultra-low permeable formation, and,thereby, increase fracture complexity in the ultra-low permeableformation. It is not to enhance large, dominant fractures but toincrease fracture complexity of small or micro fractures from whichpoint the hydrocarbons may flow to the well bore and then to thesurface, where they may be produced.

Method Embodiments

In general, according to an embodiment of the invention, A method ofincreasing the fracture complexity in a treatment zone of a subterraneanformation is provided. The subterranean formation is characterized byhaving a matrix permeability less than 1.0 microDarcy. The methodincludes the step of pumping one or more fracturing fluids into afar-field region of a treatment zone of the subterranean formation at arate and pressure above the fracture pressure of the treatment zone. Afirst fracturing fluid of the one or more fracturing fluids includes afirst solid particulate, wherein: (a) the first solid particulateincludes a particle size distribution for bridging the pore throats of aproppant pack previously formed or to be formed in the treatment zone;and (b) the first solid particulate comprises a degradable material.

Preferably, the first solid particulate is in an insufficient amount inthe first fracturing fluid to increase the packed volume fraction of anyregion of the proppant pack to greater than 73%.

Preferably, the first solid particulate is in at least a sufficientamount in the first fracturing fluid to reduce the permeability of atleast a region of the proppant pack at least 50%.

More preferably, the entirety of each of the particles of the firstsolid particulate is made of one or more degradable materials.

Step of Identifying a Subterranean Formation

The methods preferably include the step of identifying a subterraneanformation characterized by having a matrix permeability less than 1.0microDarcy. More particularly, the step of identifying includesidentifying a subterranean formation additionally characterized byhaving a matrix permeability greater than 0.001 microDarcy (equivalentto 1 nanoDarcy).

Preferably, the step of identifying includes identifying a subterraneanformation characterized by having a hydrocarbon content that issufficient for economic recovery. More preferably, the step ofidentifying includes identifying a subterranean formation additionallycharacterized by having a hydrocarbon content greater than 2% by volumegas filled porosity.

Preferably, the step of identifying includes identifying a subterraneanformation additionally characterized as being shale.

Step of Designing a Fracturing Stage

The methods preferably include the step of designing or determining afracturing stage for a treatment zone of the subterranean formation,prior to performing the fracturing stage.

According to an embodiment, the step of designing can include the stepsof: (i) determining the total designed pumping volume of the one or morefracturing fluids to be pumped into the treatment zone at a rate andpressure above the fracture pressure of the treatment zone; (ii)determining the size of a proppant of a proppant pack previously formedor to be formed in fractures in the treatment zone at any time beforethe last 2 wellbore volumes of the total designed pumping volume of thefracturing stage; (iii) determining the size of a first solidparticulate for bridging the pore throats of the proppant pack, whereinthe first solid particulate comprises a degradable material. Morepreferably, the entire particulate is made of one or more degradablematerials.

According to another embodiment, the step of designing or determiningcan include the steps of: (i) determining the total designed pumpingtime for the pumping of one or more fracturing fluids into the treatmentzone at a rate and pressure above the fracture pressure of the treatmentzone; (ii) determining the size of a proppant of a proppant packpreviously formed or to be formed in fractures in the treatment zone atany time before the last 10 minutes of the total designed pumping timeof the fracturing stage; (iii) determining the size of a first solidparticulate for bridging the pore throats of the proppant pack, whereinthe first solid particulate comprises a degradable material. It shouldbe understood that the pumping time is based on a pumping rate that isat least 20% of the pumping rate before diversion to another fracturingstage or, in the case of the final fracturing stage of a multi-stagefracturing job, the pumping rate before the end of the final fracturingstage. In the unusual case of a fracturing job having only a singletreatment zone, fracturing of the single treatment zone fracturing wouldbe considered the final fracturing stage. More preferably, the entireparticulate is made of one or more degradable materials.

Preferably, the step of designing or determining can additionallyinclude one or more of the steps of: (1) selecting a fracturing fluid,including its composition and rheological characteristics; (2) selectingthe pH of the fracturing fluid, if water-based; (3) the designtemperature; and (4) the loading of any proppant in the fracturingfluid. As used herein the term “design temperature” refers to anestimate or measurement of the actual temperature at the down holeenvironment at the time of the treatment. That is, design temperaturetakes into account not only the bottom hole static temperature (“BHST”),but also the effect of the temperature of the treatment fluid on theBHST during treatment. Because treatment fluids may be considerablycooler than BHST, the difference between the two temperatures can bequite large. Ultimately, if left undisturbed, a subterranean formationwill return to the BHST.

In a method according to the inventions that includes the step ofplanning or determining the fracturing stage, the methods then include astep of performing the fracturing stage according to the planned ordetermined fracturing stage. For example, for example, the fracturingstage can include, after or during the time the proppant pack is formedor to be formed in the treatment zone but at least before the last 2wellbore volumes of the total pumping volume, pumping a first fracturingfluid comprising the first solid particulate into the treatment zone ata rate and pressure above the fracture pressure of the treatment zone.Or, for example, the fracturing stage can include, after or during thetime the proppant pack is formed or to be formed in the treatment zonebut at least before the last 10 minutes of the total pumping time,pumping a first fracturing fluid comprising the first solid particulateinto the treatment zone at a rate and pressure above the fracturepressure of the treatment zone.

Step of Performing a Fracturing Stage

In general, a fracturing stage according to the invention preferablyincludes pumping the one or more fracturing fluids into the treatmentzone at a rate and pressure above the fracture pressure of the treatmentzone for a total pumping time longer than 30 minutes. A fracturing fluidincluding the first solid particulate should be included as part of theone or more fracturing fluids before the tail end of the fracturingstage. It should be understood that the objective of the fracturingfluid with the first solid particulate and the extended pumping time isto increase the fracture complexity far field in a zone and to increasethe stimulated fracture volume. Accordingly, the duration of fracturingof a treatment zone can be much longer than 30 minutes or the totalpumping volume of the one or more fracturing fluids can be much higherthan conventionally used in conventional reservoirs.

Fracturing Fluids

Preferably, the fracturing fluids for use in fracturing ultra-lowpermeability formations according to the methods of the invention arewater-based. One of the reasons for this is the large volumes required,and water is relatively low cost compared to oil-based fluids. Otherreasons can include concern for damaging the reservoir and environmentalconcerns.

A fracturing stage can include the step of pumping one or morefracturing fluids into a far-field region of a treatment zone. Accordingto an embodiment, the first fracturing fluid is the only fracturingfluid used in a fracturing stage. According to a more preferredembodiment, more than one fracturing fluid is used in the samefracturing stage.

Slick Water Fracturing for Ultra-Low Permeability Formation

According to the invention, a friction-reducing polymer can be includedin the treatment fluids, for example, in an amount equal to or less than0.2% by weight of the water present in the treatment fluid. Preferably,any friction-reducing polymers are included in a concentrationsufficient to reduce friction without gel formation upon mixing. By wayof example, the treatment fluid comprising the friction-reducing polymerwould not exhibit an apparent yield point. While the addition of afriction-reducing polymer may minimally increase the viscosity of thetreatment fluids, the polymers are not included in the treatment fluidsof the present invention in an amount sufficient to substantiallyincrease the viscosity. For example, if proppant is included in thetreatments fluid, velocity rather than fluid viscosity generally may berelied on for proppant transport. In some embodiments, thefriction-reducing polymer can be present in an amount in the range offrom about 0.01% to about 0.15% by weight of the treatment fluid. Insome embodiments, the friction-reducing polymer can be present in anamount in the range of from about 0.025% to about 0.1% by weight of thetreatment fluid.

Generally, the treatment fluids for use in the invention are not relyingon viscosity for proppant transport. Where particulates (e.g., proppant,first solid particulate, etc.) are included in the fracturing fluids,the fluids rely on at least velocity to transport the particulates tothe desired location in the formation. In some embodiments, thetreatment fluids may have a viscosity up to about 10 centipoise (“cP”).In some embodiments, the treatment fluids may have a viscosity in therange of from about 0.7 cP to about 10 cP. According to a preferredembodiment of the methods, the first fracturing fluid has a viscosity inthe range of about 0.7 cP to about 10 cP. According to a more preferredembodiment, all of the one or more fracturing fluids have a viscosity inthe range of about 0.7 cP to about 10 cP. For the purposes of thisdisclosure, viscosities are measured at room temperature using a FANN®Model 35 viscometer at 300 rpm with a ⅕ spring.

The ultra-low matrix permeability of a shale formation does not allowfor fracturing fluid damage to the formation or fracturing fluid leakoff into the matrix of the formation. In addition, the small proppantsizes used in fracturing to increase the fracture complexity of asubterranean formation having ultra-low matrix permeability require lessviscosity to be carried by the fracturing fluid. In addition, a higherviscosity fluid would not be able to appreciably penetrate thepermeability of a proppant pack formed with such smaller proppant.

Proppant Pack Formed or to be Formed (E.g., Remedial or PrimaryTreatment)

In an embodiment, a proppant pack can have been formed in the treatmentzone before the fracturing stage of the method. In another embodiment, aproppant pack can be formed during the fracturing stage. If the proppantpack is formed before the fracturing stage, this means that thetreatment zone was previously fractured and a proppant pack waspreviously placed in the fracture complexity. Accordingly, the methodsaccording to the invention can be adapted for remedial or primaryfracturing of a treatment zone.

Proppant Pack Formed or to be Formed (E.g., Stepwise within a FracturingStage)

In addition, it is contemplated that a proppant pack can be formedduring the fracturing stage, either before the introduction of the firstsolid particulate or simultaneously with the introduction of the firstsolid particulate. For example, one of the earlier fracturing fluidsused in a fracturing stage can include a proppant for forming a proppantpack in the fracture complexity, and one of the later fracturing fluidsused in the fracturing stage can include a first solid particulate forincreasing the fracture complexity as additional fracturing fluid ispumped into the formation.

Proppant

In an embodiment that includes a fracturing fluid with proppant, the oneor more of the fracturing fluids used in the method preferably includein the range of about 1% to about 20% by weight of the proppant.Accordingly, the proppant is in the fracturing fluid at less than about4 pounds per gallon. More preferably, one or more of the fracturingfluids includes in the range of about 5% to about 10% by weight of theproppant.

For an ultra-low permeable formation, the proppant of a proppant packformed or to be formed in the fracture complexity preferably has aparticulate size range that has an upper end equal to or less than 50U.S. Standard Mesh. More preferably, the proppant has a graded sizerange anywhere between −50/+200 U.S. Standard Mesh. Most preferably, theproppant has a graded particle size range anywhere between −70/+140 U.S.Standard Mesh. Typically, the proppant of a proppant pack formed or tobe formed in the fracture complexity of an ultra-low permeable formationhas a median particle size of about 100 U.S. Standard Mesh.

Bridging of Pore Throats of a Proppant Pack

In the context of a pack of particulate, such as a proppant pack, acertain particulate will have a predictable permeability and pore-throatsizes under a certain packing stress and other conditions. For example,all else being equal, a pack of ideal spheres of uniform size will havea predictable geometric arrangement and pore throat sizes. For such apack spheres, a first bridging particulate having ideal spheres ofuniform size in a range that is about ⅙^(th) to about 1/13^(th) of thesize of the spheres in the pack will be able to bridge the pore throatsand substantially reduce the permeability of the pack. The firstbridging particulate will itself have a predictable permeability andpore-throat sizes, but these will be much smaller than that of the pack.A second bridging particulate having a size distribution in the rangethat is about ⅙^(th) to about 1/13^(th) of the size of the firstbridging particulate would be expected to be able to bridge the porethroats and substantially reduce the permeability of the first bridgingparticulate. The complexity increases with increasing the particle sizedistribution of each of the particulates, with changes in the shape ofeach of the particulates, and with variations in the shape distributionof each of the particulates, but these basic size proportions are usefulrules of thumb.

First Solid Particulate

According to a preferred embodiment, the first particle size range hasan upper end that is greater than or equal to about 1/13^(th) of themedian particle size of the proppant (which would be equivalent to about12 μm for a 100 U.S. Standard Mesh proppant). In addition, the firstparticle size range has a lower end that is less than or equal to about⅙^(th) of the median size of the proppant (which would be equivalent toabout 25 μm or about 500 mesh for a 100 U.S. Standard Mesh proppant). Atail end of smaller or larger particles than the particle sizes of thefirst solid particulate does not interfere and can be useful accordingto the invention.

As a practical matter, for use with a 100 mesh median size proppant andaccording to a presently most preferred embodiment, the first solidparticulate includes a first solid particle size range smaller thanabout 33 μm, which is equivalent to about 400 U.S. Standard mesh.

As discussed above, the first solid particulate preferably is not in theshape of a fiber. Preferably, the particulate has aspect ratios lessthan 5:1. More preferably, the first solid particulate is substantiallyglobular in shape.

It is to be understood that the proppant would be adequately suspendedin a fracturing fluid that is similar to the first fracturing fluid butwithout the first solid particulate for the similar fracturing fluid totransport the proppant into the treatment zone. In other words, thesolid particulate is not needed to help suspend the proppant in thefracturing fluid during transport into the treatment zone.

Preferably, the first solid particulate is in the first fracturing fluidin at least a sufficient amount to reduce the permeability of at least aregion of the proppant pack by at least 50%. More preferably, the firstsolid particulate is in the first fracturing fluid in at least asufficient amount to reduce the permeability of at least a region of theproppant pack at least 90% in less than 10 minutes under the conditionsof pumping the first fracturing fluid into the treatment zone.Furthermore, one skilled in the art would recognize that determining thesize distribution of small particles (below about 200 mesh) is timeconsuming. Therefore, this empirical approach may be utilized todetermine if a give particulate containing 200 mesh and below particleshas the desired performance without actually measuring the sizedistribution of the sub-200 mesh particles is a valuable method ofdetermine the suitability of a given particulate.

According to a more preferred embodiment, the first solid particulateremains insoluble and does not otherwise appreciably degrade for atleast 2 hours under the conditions of the treatment zone. Preferably,the first solid particulate degrades under the temperature and pressureconditions of the treatment zone at least 50% by weight within 30 days.One skilled in the art would recognize that certain particulates, suchas insoluble scale inhibitors, may be tailored to have longerdissolution rates to provide a secondary benefit such as long-term scaleinhibition in excess of 30 days.

Second Smaller Solid Particulate or Tail End of First Solid Particulate

According to a further embodiment of the invention, the methodoptionally includes the step of: determining the size of a second solidparticle size range for bridging the pore throats of the first solidparticulate. Preferably, first fracturing fluid additionally comprisesthe second solid particle size range.

In an embodiment, the first solid particulate can include a secondparticle size range effective for bridging the pore throats of the firstsolid particulate. In another embodiment, the first fracturing fluidadditionally comprises a second solid particulate, wherein the secondsolid particulate has a second particle size range effective forbridging the pore throats of the first solid particulate.

Preferably, the second solid particle size range is in the firstfracturing fluid in at least a sufficient amount to reduce thepermeability of at least a region of a pack of the first solidparticulate at least 50%. More preferably, the second solid particlesize range is in the first fracturing fluid in at least a sufficientamount to reduce the permeability of at least a region of a pack of thefirst solid particulate at least 90% in less than 10 minutes under theconditions of pumping the first fracturing fluid into the treatmentzone.

Theoretical Discussion

An ideal pack of spheres will have pore throats that are about ⅙^(th)the diameter of the packed spheres. Such an idealized pack of spherescan represent a pack of proppant particles. The pore volume of a tightlypacked proppant bed is about 35% of the total pack volume. This can alsobe referred to as having a packed volume fraction (“PVF”) of about 0.65.

A first solid particulate having a diameter of about ⅙^(th) the porethroat will substantially plug the pore throat. A first solidparticulate with a diameter of ⅙^(th) the proppant particles would havea volume of about 0.46% of the proppant particle (the ratio is r³/R³where r=the radius of the first solid particulate and R=the radius ofthe proppant, the ratio resulting from the ratio of volumes of sphereswhere the volume of a sphere is 4 Pi r³/3). If one of these particles isneeded for each pore throat and there is on average one pore throat perproppant particle, then only a very small fraction of the void volume ofa particle pack is needed to be filled with the first solid particulateto get substantial plugging of the pore throats of the proppant pack.

Even if a second particulate of smaller particles are used or needed tobridge on the pore throats of the bridged first solid particulate, thesecond particulate still need not significantly fill the pore volume.Based on the idealized ratios involved, there will be three of particlesof the second particulate needed per first solid particulate. This wouldadd another 0.0064% additional volume to the void space. With theproppant and plugging particulates, the packed volume fraction, in suchan idealized case, would be about 0.655. This is consistent with thebehavior of natural core where the presence of 2% “fines” (smallerparticles that can plug pore throats in a conventional formation) isknown to be enough to cause serious damage to the permeability of theconventional formation if they are mobilized. The term “fines” refers toparticles that are small enough to become mobile if the right flowconditions are created. Even with this loading of fines, there is stilla packed volume fraction of only about 0.67.

For example, according to an embodiment, the method of increasing thefracture complexity of a subterranean formation can include the stepsof: (i) pumping a first fracturing fluid of two or more fracturingfluids into the treatment zone at a rate and pressure above the fracturepressure of the treatment zone; (ii) pumping a second fracturing fluidof the two or more fracturing fluids is pumped into the treatment zoneafter the first fracturing fluid is pumped into the treatment zonewherein the second fracturing fluid comprises a first solid particulate,wherein the first solid particulate has a size for bridging the porethroats of any proppant pack formed in the treatment zone by theproppant of the first fracturing fluid, and wherein the first solidparticulate is degradable. It should be appreciated that these stepscould be repeated or alternated in the same fracturing zone.

When this is performed there will be regions within the proppant packthat have the solid degradable particulate and regions that do not haveany. The packed volume fraction of the regions containing the soliddegradable particulate will be below 0.73; furthermore, the regions ofthe proppant pack without the solid degradable particulate will be wellbelow 0.73 and will approach or be at the native packed volume fractionfor the given proppant. In most, if not all instances, the packed volumefraction of the proppant pack as a whole will not appreciably changefrom its native value. This would also be the case for instances wherethe particulate is run throughout the proppant stage. The native packedvolume fraction for a perfect sphere of one size is on the order of 0.64to 0.68 depending upon the method used to determine the value (Torquato,S.; Truskett, T. M.; Debenedetti, P. G. Is Random Close Packing ofSpheres Well Defined? Phys. Rev. Lett. 2000, 84, 2064 as referenced inInd. Eng. Chem. Res. 2002, 41, 1122-1128).

Conceptually, the difference between the methods according to thisinvention and diversion is that diversion occurs at or near the wellboreregion. This is best illustrated by taking the hypothetical situationwhere a zone contains a single perforation. If one performs anear-wellbore diversion, that single perforation would stop taking fluidand since there is not a second perforation to take the fluid, the stagewould be complete. According to this invention, one would be able tocontinue pumping through the single perforation a fluid according to themethod of the invention.

Example of First Solid Particulate for Use with a Proppant Pack of 100U.S. Mesh Proppant

An example of a particulate having a suitable particle size distributionfor use as the first solid particulate is a particulate formed of ascale inhibitor as described herein.

FIG. 1 is a bar chart of the particle size distribution for the exampleof a solid particulate having particle sizes all less than 50 U.S. Mesh,which particulate is suitable for use in bridging the pore throats of aproppant pack formed of 100 U.S. Standard Mesh size proppant. More than50% by weight of the particulate has a particle size distribution of−50/+200 U.S. Mesh. This particulate includes a tail-end size range ofthe particulate having particles sizes less than 200 U.S. Standard mesh.The particulate size distributions were determined by graded screening.

The particulate size distribution of this example material was alsomeasured using a MASTERSIZER® 2000 particulate analyzer with a 2000Ssampler and MASTERSIZER® Software v 5.60. This instrument uses laserlight scattering to compute the size of particles with sizes rangingfrom 0.02 μm to 2000 μm. The amount of scattered light as well as theangle of scattering can be used to determine the size of a particle thatis dispersed in either air or liquid. The system is capable of examiningsolid particulate, emulsions, and suspensions. The instrument settingswere:

Sample RI: 1.5 (Actual RI unknown, but most organic materials are ˜1.5)

Absorption Value: 0.1

Dispersant: Air

Stir Speed: N/A

Sonication: N/A

Disperser Pressure: 2.0 bar

Feed Rate: 13-18

Measurement Time: 5 s

Calculation Model: General Purpose (Fine)

FIG. 2 is a graph of the particle size distribution as measured with theMASTERSIZER® instrument. The upper end of the particle size range isabout 630 micrometers and the median particle size is about 72.5micrometers. This measurement is in volume percent, whereas the analysisshown in FIG. 1 is in weight percent.

FIG. 3 is a graph of the permeability measurements of a laboratoryexperiment illustrating the effectiveness of temporary reduction of thepermeability of a 100 U.S. Standard Mesh proppant pack with 5% w/w ofthe example degradable particulate having a particle size distributionas shown in FIGS. 1 and 2. The laboratory procedure was as follows: Packa flow cell with 100 U.S. Standard Mesh proppant. The cell used had a 1inch internal diameter and 6 inches in length with a screen on thebottom to retain the 100 mesh proppant. Flow water through the proppantpack at constant pressure to get a baseline flow rate. Repack cell withthe 100 mesh proppant mixed with 5% by weight of the degradableparticulate relative to the weight of the proppant. In this example, thedegradable particulate is a chemical capable of inhibiting scale asdescribed herein. Flow water through proppant pack at constant pressureand measure flow rate with time to determine the permeability. Asillustrated in FIG. 3, the permeability of a pack of 100 Mesh proppantwith 5% w/w of the degradable particulate is temporarily reduced

FIG. 4 is a graph of the general relationship between the weight percentof the degradable particles mixed with a 100 U.S. Standard Mesh proppantpack and the packed volume fraction when the mixed particles are packed.A proppant pack will typically have a packed volume fraction of about0.65, with a small variation depending on how tightly packed. Adding thedegradable particulate increases the packed volume fraction relative tothe proppant pack alone. As illustrated in FIG. 3, a 5% wt/wt of theexample first solid particulate is more than sufficient to increase thepacked volume fraction to about 0.7 and to reduce the permeability ofthe proppant pack more than 90%. Any additional proportion of the firstsolid particulate to the proppant beyond that necessary to achieve abouta 90% reduction in the proppant pack permeability would be wasted forthe purposes of the present inventions.

Preferably, the first solid particulate does not increase the packedvolume fraction to more than 0.73. Preferably, the sum total of allsolid particulate included in the fracturing fluid does not increase thepacked volume fraction of a proppant pack formed or to be formed in theformation to more than 0.73.

Degradable Solid Particulate

The first solid particulate for use in the methods according to theinvention is selected to be degradable. Preferably, any second solidparticulate is also selected to be degradable, although any second solidparticulate is not required to be degradable. As the first solidparticulate is degradable, when the first solid particulate degrades anysecond particulate should be small enough to pass through the porethroats of the proppant pack. The chemical composition of the secondsolid particulate can be the same or different as the first solidparticulate.

As used herein, a degradable material is capable of undergoing anirreversible degradation downhole. The term “irreversible” as usedherein means that the degradable material once degraded should notrecrystallize or reconsolidate while downhole in the treatment zone,that is, the degradable material should degrade in situ but should notrecrystallize or reconsolidate in situ.

The terms “degradable” or “degradation” refer to both the two relativelyextreme cases of degradation that the degradable material may undergo,that is, heterogeneous (or bulk erosion) and homogeneous (or surfaceerosion), and any stage of degradation in between these two.

Preferably, the degradable material of the particulate degrades slowlyover time as opposed to instantaneously.

The specific features of the degradable material of a first solidparticulate may be modified so as to reduce the permeability of aproppant pack when intact while easing the removal of the degradablematerial when desirable. Whichever degradable material is utilized, thebridging agents may have any shape, including but not limited toparticles having the physical shape of platelets, shavings, flakes,ribbons, rods, strips, spheroids, toroids, pellets, tablets, or anyother physical shape. One of ordinary skill in the art with the benefitof this disclosure will recognize the specific degradable material andthe preferred size and shape for a given application. Preferably,however, the particulate for use in the methods according to theinvention is not fiber shaped. More preferably, the particulate for usein the present invention is globular or generally spherical.

The bridging in the proppant pack formed by a solid particulatecomprising a degradable material according to the present invention ispreferably “self-degrading.” As referred to herein, the term“self-degrading” means bridging may be removed without the need tocirculate a separate “clean up” solution or “breaker” into the treatmentzone, wherein such clean up solution or breaker having no purpose otherthan to degrade the bridging in the proppant pack. Though the bridgingformed by the methods of the present invention constitute“self-degrading” bridging, an operator may nevertheless elect tocirculate a separate clean up solution through the well bore and intothe treatment zone under certain circumstances, such as when theoperator desires to hasten the rate of degradation of the bridging inthe proppant pack. In certain embodiments, the particulate of thepresent invention is sufficiently acid-degradable as to be removed bysuch treatment.

The degradation can be a result of, inter alia, a chemical or thermalreaction or a reaction induced by radiation. The degradable particulateis preferably selected to degrade by at least one mechanism selectedfrom the group consisting of: hydrolysis, hydration followed bydissolution, dissolution, decomposition, or sublimation.

The choice of degradable material for use in the degradable particulatecan depend, at least in part, on the conditions of the well, e.g.,wellbore temperature. For instance, lactides can be suitable for lowertemperature wells, including those within the range of about 60° F. toabout 150° F., and polylactides can be suitable for well boretemperatures above this range. Dehydrated salts may also be suitable forhigher temperature wells.

In general, selection of a degradable particulate and fracturing fluiddepends on a number of factors including: (1) the degradability of thematerial of the particulate; (2) the particle size of the particulate;(3) the pH of the fracturing fluid, if water-based; (4) the designtemperature; and (5) the loading of degradable particulate in thefracturing fluid. The step of designing or determining a fracturingstage preferably includes selecting a suitable degradable particulateand fracturing fluid for the fracturing stage.

In choosing the appropriate degradable material, the degradationproducts that will result should also be considered. For example, thedegradation products should not adversely affect other operations orcomponents in the well. As an example of this consideration, a boricacid derivative may not be included as a degradable material in thefracturing fluids of the present invention where such fluids utilizexanthan as the viscosifier, because boric acid and xanthan are generallyincompatible. One of ordinary skill in the art, with the benefit of thisdisclosure, will be able to recognize when potential components of thefracturing fluids of the present invention would be incompatible orwould produce degradation products that would adversely affect otheroperations or components.

It is to be understood that a particulate can include mixtures of two ormore different degradable compounds.

Degradable Polymers

As for degradable polymers, a polymer is considered to be “degradable”herein if the degradation is due to, inter alia, chemical or radicalprocess such as hydrolysis, oxidation, enzymatic degradation, or UVradiation. The degradability of a polymer depends at least in part onits backbone structure. For instance, the presence of hydrolyzable oroxidizable linkages in the backbone often yields a material that willdegrade as described herein. The rates at which such polymers degradeare dependent on the type of repetitive unit, composition, sequence,length, molecular geometry, molecular weight, morphology (e.g.,crystallinity, size of spherulites, and orientation), hydrophilicity,hydrophobicity, surface area, and additives. Also, the environment towhich the polymer is subjected may affect how the polymer degrades,e.g., temperature, presence of moisture, oxygen, microorganisms,enzymes, pH, and the like.

Some examples of degradable polymers are disclosed in U.S. PatentPublication No. 2010/0267591, having for named inventors Bradley L. Toddand Trinidad Munoz, which is incorporated herein by reference, disclosessome suitable chemical compositions that can be sized for particulatematerials for use in methods according to the present invention.

Suitable examples of degradable polymers that may be used in accordancewith the present invention include but are not limited to thosedescribed in the publication of Advances in Polymer Science, Vol. 157entitled “Degradable Aliphatic Polyesters” edited by A.-C. Albertssonand the publication “Biopolymers” Vols. 1-10, especially Vol. 3b,Polyester II: Properties and Chemical Synthesis and Vol. 4, PolyesterIII: Application and Commercial Products edited by AlexanderSteinbuchel, Wiley-VCM.

Non-limiting examples of degradable materials that may be used inconjunction with the present invention include, but are not limited toaromatic polyesters and aliphatic polyesters. Such polyesters may belinear, graft, branched, crosslinked, block, dendritic, homopolymers,random, block, and star- and hyper-branched aliphatic polyesters, etc.

Some suitable polymers include poly(hydroxy alkanoate) (PHA);poly(alpha-hydroxy) acids such as polylactic acid (PLA), polygylcolicacid (PGA), polylactide, and polyglycolide; poly(beta-hydroxyalkanoates) such as poly(beta-hydroxy butyrate) (PHB) andpoly(beta-hydroxybutyrates-co-beta-hydroxyvelerate) (PHBV);poly(omega-hydroxy alkanoates) such as poly(beta-propiolactone) (PPL)and poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL); poly(alkylene dicarboxylates) such aspoly(ethylene succinate) (PES), poly(butylene succinate) (PBS); andpoly(butylene succinate-co-butylene adipate); polyanhydrides such aspoly(adipic anhydride); poly(orthoesters); polycarbonates such aspoly(trimethylene carbonate); and poly(dioxepan-2-one)]; aliphaticpolyesters; poly(lactides); poly(glycolides); poly(ε-caprolactones);poly(hydroxybutyrates); poly(anhydrides); aliphatic polycarbonates;poly(orthoesters); poly(amino acids); poly(ethylene oxides); andpolyphosphazenes. Of these suitable polymers, aliphatic polyesters andpolyanhydrides are preferred. Derivatives of the above materials mayalso be suitable, in particular, derivatives that have added functionalgroups that may help control degradation rates.

Aliphatic polyesters degrade chemically, inter alia, by hydrolyticcleavage. Hydrolysis can be catalyzed by acids, bases, enzymes, or metalsalt catalyst solutions. Generally, during the hydrolysis, carboxylicend groups are formed during chain scission, and this may enhance therate of further hydrolysis. This mechanism is known in the art as“autocatalysis,” and is thought to make polyester matrices more bulkeroding. Suitable aliphatic polyesters have the general formula ofrepeating units shown below:

where n is an integer above 75 and more preferably between 75 and 10,000and R is selected from the group consisting of hydrogen, alkyl, aryl,alkylaryl, acetyl, heteroatoms, and mixtures thereof.

Of the suitable aliphatic polyesters, poly(lactide) is preferred.Poly(lactide) is synthesized either from lactic acid by a condensationreaction or more commonly by ring-opening polymerization of cycliclactide monomer. Since both lactic acid and lactide can achieve the samerepeating unit, the general term poly(lactic acid) as used herein refersto formula I without any limitation as to how the polymer was made suchas from lactides, lactic acid, or oligomers, and without reference tothe degree of polymerization or level of plasticization.

The lactide monomer exists generally in three different forms: twostereoisomers L- and D-lactide and racemic D,L-lactide (meso-lactide).The oligomers of lactic acid and oligomers of lactide are defined by theformula:

where m is an integer 2≦m≦75. Preferably m is an integer and 2≦m≦10.These limits correspond to number average molecular weights below about5,400 and below about 720, respectively. The chirality of the lactideunits provides a means to adjust, inter alia, degradation rates, as wellas physical and mechanical properties. Poly(L-lactide), for instance, isa semicrystalline polymer with a relatively slow hydrolysis rate. Thiscould be desirable in applications of the present invention where aslower degradation of the degradable material is desired.Poly(D,L-lactide) may be a more amorphous polymer with a resultantfaster hydrolysis rate. This may be suitable for other applicationswhere a more rapid degradation may be appropriate. The stereoisomers oflactic acid may be used individually or combined to be used inaccordance with the present invention. Additionally, they may becopolymerized with, for example, glycolide or other monomers likeε-caprolactone, 1,5-dioxepan-2-one, trimethylene carbonate, or othersuitable monomers to obtain polymers with different properties ordegradation times. Additionally, the lactic acid stereoisomers can bemodified to be used in the present invention by, inter alia, blending,copolymerizing or otherwise mixing the stereoisomers, blending,copolymerizing or otherwise mixing high and low molecular weightpolylactides, or by blending, copolymerizing or otherwise mixing apolylactide with another polyester or polyesters. See U.S. applicationPublication Nos. 2005/0205265 and 2006/0065397, incorporated herein byreference. One skilled in the art would recognize the utility ofoligomers of other organic acids that are polyesters.

For the purposes of forming a suitable solid particulate, the polymer(or oligomer) should have at least a sufficient degree of polymerizationor level of plasticization to be a solid.

Polycondensation reactions, ring-opening polymerizations, free radicalpolymerizations, anionic polymerizations, carbocationic polymerizations,coordinative ring-opening polymerization, and any other suitable processmay prepare such suitable polymers.

Degradable Anionic Compounds that can Bind a Multi-Valent Metal

Certain anionic compounds that can bind a multi-valent metal aredegradable. More preferably, the anionic compound is capable of bindingwith any one of the following: Calcium, magnesium, iron, lead, barium,strontium, titanium, zinc, and/or zirconium. One skilled in the artwould recognize that proper conditions (such as pH) may be required forthis to take place.

Examples of anionic compounds that can bind with a multi-valent metalinclude scale inhibiting chemicals and chelating chemicals. Examples ofsuitable scale-inhibiting and chelating chemicals are disclosed in U.S.application Ser. No. 12/512,232 filed on Jul. 30, 2009, entitled“Methods of Fluid Loss Control and Fluid Diversion in SubterraneanFormations,” incorporated herein by reference.

According to a presently preferred embodiment of a particulatecomprising an anionic compound, the first solid particulate comprises ascale inhibitor. In general, suitable scale inhibitors for use in thepresent invention may be any scale inhibitor in particulate form that isinsoluble in water. Suitable scale inhibitors generally include, but arenot limited to, bis(hexamethylene triamine penta (methylene phosphonicacid)); diethylene triamine penta (methylene phosphonic acid); ethylenediamine tetra (methylene phosphonic acid); hexamethylenediaminetetra(methylene phosphonic acid); 1-hydroxy ethylidene-1,1-diphosphonicacid; 2-hydroxyphosphonocarboxylic acid;2-phosphonobutane-1,2,4-tricarboxylic acid; phosphino carboxylic acid;diglycol amine phosphonate; aminotris(methanephosphonic acid); methylenephosphonates; phosphonic acids; aminoalkylene phosphonic acids;aminoalkyl phosphonic acids; polyphosphates, salts thereof (such as butnot limited to: sodium, potassium, calcium, magnesium, ammonium); andcombinations thereof. As an added benefit, these types of particulatehave scale-inhibiting properties, wherein the particulate releases thescale inhibitor over time.

In some embodiments, the particulate comprises a chelating agent,wherein the chelating agent is insoluble in water. The chelating agentsuseful in the present invention may be any suitable chelating agent inparticulate form that is insoluble in water. Suitable chelating agentsgenerally include, but are not limited to, the acidic forms of thefollowing: ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), hydroxyethylethylenediamine triacetic acid (HEDTA), nitrilotriacetic acid (NTA),diethylene triamine pentaacetic acid (DTPA), glutamic acid diacetic acid(GLDA), glucoheptonic acid (CSA), propylene diamine tetraacetic acid(PDTA), ethylenediaminedisuccinic acid (EDDS), diethanolglycine (DEG),ethanoldiglycine (EDG), glucoheptonate, citric acid, malic acid,phosphates, amines, citrates, derivatives thereof, and combinationsthereof. Other suitable chelating agents may include the acidic forms ofchelating agents classified as polyphosphates (such as sodiumtripolyphosphate and hexametaposphoric acid), aminocarboxylic acids(such as N-dihydroxyethylglycine), aminopolycarboxylates, 1,3-diketones(such as acetylacetone, trifluoroacetylacetone, andthenoyltrifluoroacetone), hydroxycarboxylic acids (such as tartaricacid, gluconic acid and 5-sulfosalicylic acid), polyamines (such asethylenediamine, dethylentriamine, treithylenetetramine, andtriaminotriethylamine), aminoalcohols (such as triethanolamine,N-hydroxyethylethylenediamine), aromatic heterocyclic bases (such asdipyridyl and o-phenanthroline), phenols (such as salicylaldehyde,disulfopyrocatechol, and chromotropic acid), aminophenols (such as oxineand 8-hydroxyquinoline), oximes (such as oxinesulfonic acid,dimethylglyoxime, and salicylaldoxime), Schiff bases (such asdisaliclaldehyde 1,2-propylenediimine), tetrapyrroles (such astetraphenylporphine and phthalocyanine), sulfur compounds (such astoluenedithiol, dimercaptopropanol, thioglycolic acid, potassium ethylxanthate, sodium diethyldithiocarbamate, dithizone, diethyldithiophosphoric acid, and thiourea), synthetic macrocyclic compounds(such as dibenzo-[18]-crown-6, and hexamthyl-[14]-4,11dieneN₄(2.2.2-cryptate), polymers (such as polyethoeneimines,polymethacryloylacetone, poly(p-vinylbenzyliminodiacetic acid),phosphonic acids (such as nitrilotrimethylenephosphonic acid,ethylenediaminetetra(methylenephosphonic acid) andhydroxyethylidenediphosphonic acid), derivatives thereof, andcombinations thereof.

In general, particulates comprising a scale inhibitor or a chelatingagent suitable for use in the present invention are insoluble in water,but are substantially soluble when contacted with a solubilizing agent.Therefore, in certain embodiments, once the fracturing treatmentoperation has been completed, a solubilizing agent is introduced intothe well bore (or may be already present in the subterranean formation),whereby the particulate comprising a scale inhibitor or a chelatingagent is dissolved. In some embodiments, the solubilizing agent may havethe effect of causing the particulate comprising a scale inhibitor or achelating agent to form its free acid, to dissolve, to hydrolyze intosolution, to form its salt, to change salts, etc. and thereby becomesoluble. After a chosen time, the fracturing fluid may be recoveredthrough the well bore that penetrates the subterranean formation.

Suitable solubilizing agents include salts, including ammonium salts, oraqueous fluids containing a salt or having a different pH than thefracturing fluid, such as brine, formation fluids (e.g., producedformation water, returned load water, etc.), acidic fluids, and spentacid. The type of solubilizing agent used generally depends upon thetype of particulate to be solubilized. For example, solubilizing agentscomprising acidic fluids may be suitable for use with polymeric scaleinhibitors. One of ordinary skill in the art with the benefit of thisdisclosure will be able to select an appropriate solubilizing agentbased on the type of scale inhibitor or chelating agent used.

In some embodiments, the fracturing fluid can optionally comprise anacid generating compound. Examples of acid generating compounds that maybe suitable for use in the present invention include, but are notlimited to, esters, aliphatic polyesters, ortho esters, which may alsobe known as ortho ethers, poly (ortho esters), which may also be knownas poly(ortho ethers), poly(lactides), poly(glycolides),poly(ε-caprolactones), poly(hydroxybutyrates), poly(anhydrides), orcopolymers thereof. Derivatives and combinations also may be suitable.The term “copolymer” as used herein is not limited to the combination oftwo polymers, but includes any combination of polymers, e.g.,terpolymers. Other suitable acid-generating compounds include: estersincluding, but not limited to, ethylene glycol monoformate, ethyleneglycol diformate, diethylene glycol diformate, glyceryl monoformate,glyceryl diformate, glyceryl triformate, triethylene glycol diformateand formate esters of pentaerythritol. Other suitable materials may bedisclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,877,563 and 7,021,383, the disclosures ofwhich are incorporated by reference.

In some embodiments, particulates comprising a scale inhibitor or achelating agent suitable for use in the present invention may be atleast partially coated or encapsulated with slowly water soluble orother similar encapsulating materials. Such materials are well known tothose skilled in the art. Examples of water-soluble and other similarencapsulating materials that can be utilized include, but are notlimited to, porous solid materials such as precipitated silica,elastomers, polyvinylidene chloride (PVDC), nylon, waxes, polyurethanes,cross-linked partially hydrolyzed acrylics, and the like.

Degradable anionic compounds that can bind a multi-valent metaladvantage over other potential chemistries are their ability to providea secondary function such as scale or iron control. This may alsoprovide an economical advantage.

Solid Materials that Degrade by Sublimation

Suitable examples of degradable materials that can be used in accordancewith the present invention include but are not limited to those thatsublime under the design temperature or finally under the bottom holestatic temperature (“BHST”) of the treatment zone.

An example of a suitable solid is a solid azo organic compound having anazo component and a methylenic component and is characterized by havinga melting point of at least 332.6° F., a degree of solubility in waterat a temperature of from about 200° F. to about 425° F. and a pressureof 600 pounds per square inch (p.s.i.) of less than about 20 pounds ofthe compound in 1,000 gallons of water, a degree of solubility inkerosene at a temperature of from about 200° F. to about 425° F. and apressure of 600 p.s.i. of at least 2 pounds of the compound in 1,000gallons of kerosene, and a sublimation rate at a temperature of fromabout 250° F. to about 425° F. of from about 1 percent by weight of thecompound in 24 hours to about 100 percent by weight of the compound in12 hours.

Examples of suitable solid azo compounds having an azo component and amethylenic component such as the compounds known as Hansa Yellow G andFast Yellow 4RLF. Hansa Yellow G can be made by couplingorthonitroparatoluidine and acetoacetanilid. Methods of its preparationare well known and are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 2,410,219. Fast Yellow4RLF dye's preparation is well known and is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No.2,410,219. Additional disclosure is provided in U.S. Pat. No. 4,527,628.U.S. Pat. Nos. 2,410,219 and 4,527,628 are incorporated by reference.

Solid materials that degrade by sublimation have a technical advantagein that no aqueous phase is needed for their degradation.

Degradable Dehydrated Compounds

Dehydrated compounds may be used in accordance with the presentinvention as a degradable material. As used herein, a dehydratedcompound means a compound that is anhydrous or of a lower hydrationstate, but chemically reacts with water to form one or more hydratedstates where the hydrated state is more soluble than the dehydrated orlower hydrated state.

A dehydrated compound is suitable for use in the present invention if itwill degrade over time as it is hydrated. For example, a particulatesolid anhydrous borate material that degrades over time can be suitable.Specific examples of particulate solid anhydrous borate materials thatmay be used include but are not limited to anhydrous sodium tetraborate(also known as anhydrous borax), and anhydrous boric acid. Theseanhydrous borate materials are only slightly soluble in water. However,with time and heat in a subterranean environment, the anhydrous boratematerials react with the surrounding aqueous fluid and are hydrated. Theresulting hydrated borate materials are substantially soluble in wateras compared to anhydrous borate materials and as a result degrade in theaqueous fluid. In some instances, the total time required for theanhydrous borate materials to degrade in an aqueous fluid is in therange of from about 8 hours to about 72 hours depending upon thetemperature of the treatment zone in which they are placed.

Examples of suitable boron compounds are disclosed in U.S. patentapplication Ser. No. 12/957,522, filed on Dec. 1, 2010, entitled“Methods of Providing Fluid Loss Control or Diversion,” incorporatedherein by reference. A relatively insoluble borate material (“RIBM”)degrades or dissolves in the presence of an aqueous fluid in contacttherewith and, once removed, the free movement of fluids within theformation is again allowed.

The RIBM's suitable for use in the present invention include, but arenot limited to, solid, slowly soluble borate materials such as anhydroussodium tetraborate (also known as anhydrous borax), sodium tetraboratemonohydrate, and anhydrous boric acid (also known as boric oxide).Without being limited by theory, it is believed that these boratematerials are only slightly soluble in water; however, with time andheat in the subterranean zone, the borate materials react with thesurrounding aqueous fluid and are hydrated. The resulting hydratedborate materials are highly soluble in water as compared to theanhydrous borate materials and as a result can be dissolved in anaqueous fluid. The total time required for the anhydrous boratematerials to degrade and dissolve in an aqueous fluid is in the range offrom about eight hours to about seventy-two hours depending upon thetemperature of the subterranean zone in which they are placed. Oneskilled in the art would recognize that some hydrates, such as sodiumtetraborate monohydrate, are relatively insoluble compared to theircounterparts that are hydrated to a greater degree.

The RIBM degrades over time when in contact with an aqueous fluid andconverts to the hydrated form of borate material. The treatment fluiditself may be aqueous, or the RIBM may come into contact with waterafter it is placed into the subterranean formation. The RIBM dissolvesin an aqueous fluid, thereby eliminating the need for contacting thesubterranean zone with clean-up fluids to remove the material andrestore permeability. Another advantage of the relatively insolubleborate material particulates used in the present invention is that themelting points of the materials are high, i.e., 1367° F. for anhydroussodium tetraborate and 840° F. for anhydrous boric oxide, and as aresult, the materials do not readily soften and are suitable for use inhigh temperature subterranean zones.

Selection of an RIBM and treatment fluid for a desired use depends on anumber of factors including (1) the solubility of the chosen RIBM, (2)the particle size of the RIBM, (3) the pH of the treatment fluid, (4)the design temperature, and (5) the loading of RIBM in the treatmentfluid.

The solubility of the RIBM can be affected by the pH of the treatmentfluid, by the design temperature, and by the selection of the RIBMitself. By way of example, for pH levels of between about 8 and 12,higher pH increases solubility of an anhydrous boric acid RIBM towhereas decreasing the pH increases the solubility of an anhydrous boraxRIBM. In preferred embodiments of the present invention, the solubilityof the RIBM is controlled such that complete dissolution of the RIBM atdesign temperature takes more than two hours, and in some cases longerthan a week. In still other preferred embodiments, the solubility of theRIBM is controlled such that 50% dissolution of the RIBM at designtemperature takes at least two hours. In still other preferredembodiments, the solubility of the RIBM is controlled such that 50%dissolution of the RIBM at design temperature takes at least twenty-fourhours.

To allow for relatively slow solubility, the treatment fluids of thepresent invention are preferably pH neutral or below, at leastinitially.

Degradable Liquid Particulate in Fracturing Fluid to Reduce Flow througha Proppant Pack

According to another embodiment of the inventions, an insoluble liquidparticulate that is degradable can be included in the fracturing fluidto help increase fracture complexity. The insoluble liquid particulatecan be used to form an emulsion, whereby the apparent viscosity of thefracturing fluid is increased. This reduces the permeability of theproppant pack to the fracturing fluid, which can be used to help reducethe flow of fracturing fluid through the proppant pack, therebyincreasing fracturing fluid. The methods of using an insoluble solidparticulate can be particularly effective when combined with the methodof using an insoluble liquid particulate.

Suitable degradable liquids include acid generating compounds. Examplesof acid generating compounds that depending on molecular weight andother chemical properties can be in a liquid state include esters; orthoethers (that may be referred to as ortho esters); poly(ortho ethers).Aliphatic polyesters; lactides, poly(lactides); glycolides;poly(glycolides); lactones; poly(.epsilon.-caprolactones);poly(hydroxybutyrates); anhydrides; poly(anhydrides); and poly(aminoacids) may also be suitable if dissolved in an appropriate solvent thatdoes not negatively impact the subterranean formation in which they beused (e.g., they do not create an additional clean up hindrance). Suchcompounds are described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,686,080, which isincorporated herein by reference.

Degradable dehydrated compounds have several advantageous properties.First, they have minimal impact on the pH. Second, some also swell andthis may provide additional control of fluid flow. Finally, theytypically degrade faster than degradable polymers.

Step of Allowing or Causing the Particulate to Degrade

After the step of introducing a fracturing fluid comprising the firstsolid particulate, the methods include a step of allowing or causing thefirst solid particulate to degrade. If a second particulate that isdegradable is used, the methods preferably include a step of allowing orcausing the second particulate to degrade. The first and secondparticulates can be the same or different, and can degrade at the sameor different rates. As discussed above, this preferably occurs with timeunder the conditions in the zone of the subterranean fluid. It iscontemplated, however, that a clean-up treatment could be introducedinto the zone to help degrade the degradable material of the first solidparticulate.

Additional Step of Monitoring

Any of the methods according to the invention preferably further includea step of monitoring the wellhead pressure to help determine the actualend of the fracturing stage. The end of the fracturing stage is the endof pumping into the treatment zone, which can be due to screenout at ornear the wellbore or other mechanical or chemical diversion of fluid toa different treatment zone.

According to another embodiment, the methods more preferably furtherinclude a step of monitoring the pressure in the wellbore along thetreatment zone.

According to a presently most-preferred embodiment, the methods mostpreferably further include a step of determining microseismic activitynear the zone to confirm an increase in fracture complexity in thetreatment zone.

Seismic data is used in many scientific fields to monitor undergroundevents in subterranean rock formations. In order to investigate theseunderground events, micro-earthquakes, also known as microseisms, aredetected and monitored. Like earthquakes, microseisms emit elasticwaves—compressional (“p-waves”) and shear (“s-waves”), but they occur atmuch higher frequencies than those of earthquakes and generally fallwithin the acoustic frequency range of 200 Hz to more than 2000 Hz.Standard microseismic analysis techniques locate the sources of themicroseismic activity caused by fluid injection or hydraulic fracturing

Microseismic detection is often utilized in conjunction with hydraulicfracturing or water flooding techniques to map created fractures. Ahydraulic fracture induces an increase in the formation stressproportional to the net fracturing pressure as well as an increase inpore pressure due to fracturing fluid leak off. Large tensile stressesare formed ahead of the crack tip, which creates large amounts of shearstress. Both mechanisms, pore pressure increase and formation stressincrease, affect the stability of planes of weakness (such as naturalfractures and bedding planes) surrounding the hydraulic fracture andcause them to undergo shear slippage. It is these shear slippages thatare analogous to small earthquakes along faults.

Microseisms are detected with multiple receivers (transducers) deployedon a wireline array in one or more offset well bores. With the receiversdeployed in several wells, the microseism locations can be triangulatedas is done in earthquake detection. Triangulation is accomplished bydetermining the arrival times of the various p- and s-waves, and usingformation velocities to find the best-fit location of the microseisms.However, multiple offset wells are not usually available. With only asingle nearby offset observation well, a multi-level vertical array ofreceivers is used to locate the microseisms. Data is then transferred tothe surface for subsequent processing to yield a map of the hydraulicfracture network geometry.

Additional Step of Repeating Method in another Treatment Zone

The methods according to the invention have application in multi-stagefracturing of a subterranean formation having ultra-low permeability.Preferably, a method according to the invention further includesrepeating the steps for another treatment zone of the subterraneanformation: (a) designing a fracturing stage for a treatment zone of thesubterranean formation; and (b) performing the fracturing stage asdesigned.

Additional Step of Producing Hydrocarbon from Subterranean Formation

Preferably, the methods according to the invention further include thestep of producing hydrocarbon from the subterranean formation.

CONCLUSIONS

Therefore, the present invention is well adapted to attain the ends andadvantages mentioned as well as those that are inherent therein. Theparticular embodiments disclosed above are illustrative only, as thepresent invention may be modified and practiced in different butequivalent manners apparent to those skilled in the art having thebenefit of the teachings herein. Furthermore, no limitations areintended to the details of construction or design herein shown, otherthan as described in the claims below. It is, therefore, evident thatthe particular illustrative embodiments disclosed above may be alteredor modified and all such variations are considered within the scope andspirit of the present invention. While compositions and methods aredescribed in terms of “comprising,” “containing,” or “including” variouscomponents or steps, the compositions and methods also can “consistessentially of” or “consist of” the various components and steps.Whenever a numerical range with a lower limit and an upper limit isdisclosed, any number and any included range falling within the range isspecifically disclosed. In particular, every range of values (of theform, “from about a to about b,” or, equivalently, “from approximately ato b,” or, equivalently, “from approximately a to b”) disclosed hereinis to be understood to set forth every number and range encompassedwithin the broader range of values. Also, the terms in the claims havetheir plain, ordinary meaning unless otherwise explicitly and clearlydefined by the patentee. Moreover, the indefinite articles “a” or “an”,as used in the claims, are defined herein to mean one or more than oneof the element that it introduces. If there is any conflict in theusages of a word or term in this specification and one or more patent(s)or other documents that may be incorporated herein by reference, thedefinitions that are consistent with this specification should beadopted.

What is claimed is:
 1. A method of increasing the fracture complexity ina treatment zone of a subterranean formation, wherein the subterraneanformation is characterized by having a matrix permeability less than 1.0microDarcy, the method comprising the step of: pumping one or morefracturing fluids into a far-field region of a treatment zone of thesubterranean formation at a rate and pressure above the fracturepressure of the treatment zone, wherein a first fracturing fluid of theone or more fracturing fluids comprises a first solid particulate, andwherein: (a) the first solid particulate comprises a first particle sizerange effective for bridging the pore throats of a proppant packpreviously formed or to be formed in the far-field region of thetreatment zone, wherein the first particle size range has a lower endthat is greater than or equal to about 1/13^(th) of the median particlesize of the proppant; (b) the first solid particulate is in aninsufficient amount in the first fracturing fluid to increase the packedvolume fraction of any region of the proppant pack to greater than 73%;and (c) the first solid particulate comprises a degradable material thatis a dehydrated compound.
 2. The method according to claim 1, whereinthe dehydrated compound is a relatively insoluble borate material. 3.The method according to claim 2, wherein the relatively insoluble boratematerial is selected from the group consisting of anhydrous sodiumtetraborate, sodium tetraborate monohydrate, anhydrous boric acid, andcombinations thereof.
 4. The method according to claim 2, wherein the pHof the first fracturing fluid is neutral or lower.
 5. The methodaccording to claim 2, wherein the total time required for the anhydrousborate materials to degrade and dissolve in an aqueous fluid is in therange of from about eight hours to about seventy-two hours under adesign temperature for the subterranean zone.
 6. The method according toclaim 2, the solubility of the relatively insoluble borate material iscontrolled such that 50% dissolution of the relatively insoluble boratematerial at design temperature takes at least two hours.
 7. The methodaccording to claim 1, wherein the first solid particulate is in at leasta sufficient amount in the first fracturing fluid to reduce thepermeability of at least a region of the proppant pack at least 50%. 8.The method according to claim 1, wherein the first fracturing fluid hasa viscosity in the range of about 0.7 cP to about 10 cP.
 9. The methodaccording to claim 1, wherein the first fracturing fluid is the onlyfracturing fluid used in the fracturing stage.
 10. The method accordingto claim 1, wherein one or more of the fracturing fluids comprises theproppant for forming the proppant pack.
 11. The method according toclaim 1, wherein the first fracturing fluid comprises the proppant. 12.The method according to claim 1, wherein the proppant of the proppantpack has a graded particle size range anywhere between −70/+140 U.S.Standard Mesh.
 13. The method according to claim 1, wherein the proppantpack is previously formed in the treatment zone before the fracturingstage.
 14. The method according to claim 1, wherein the proppant pack isto be formed in the treatment zone during the fracturing stage.
 15. Themethod according to claim 1, wherein the first particle size range hasan upper end that is less than or equal to about ⅙^(th) of the mediansize of the proppant.
 16. The method according to claim 15, wherein theproppant of the proppant pack is equal to or less than 100 U.S. StandardMesh.
 17. The method according to claim 1, wherein the first solidparticulate comprises a second particle size range effective forbridging the pore throats of the first solid particulate.
 18. The methodaccording to claim 1, wherein the first fracturing fluid comprises asecond solid particulate, wherein the second solid particulate has asecond particle size range effective for bridging the pore throats ofthe first solid particulate.
 19. The method according to claim 18,wherein the second solid particulate is degradable.
 20. The methodaccording to claim 1, further comprising the step of: after pumping theone or more fracturing fluids into the treatment zone, allowing orcausing the first solid particulate to degrade.
 21. The method accordingto claim 1, further comprising: determining microseismic activity toconfirm an increase in fracture complexity in the treatment zone. 22.The method according to claim 1, further comprising repeating the stepof pumping in another treatment zone of the subterranean formation. 23.The method according to claim 1, wherein the first particulate consistsof the degradable material.
 24. A method of increasing the fracturecomplexity in a treatment zone of a subterranean formation, wherein thesubterranean formation is characterized by having a matrix permeabilityless than 1.0 microDarcy, the method comprising the step of: pumping twoor more fracturing fluids into the treatment zone at a rate and pressureabove the fracture pressure of the treatment zone for a total pumpingvolume greater than 2 wellbore volumes, wherein: (a) a first fracturingfluid of the two or more fracturing fluids is pumped into the treatmentzone at least before the last 2 wellbore volumes of the total pumpingvolume, wherein the first fracturing fluid comprises a proppant, whereinthe first fracturing fluid does not include a first solid particulate;and (b) a second fracturing fluid of the two or more fracturing fluidsis pumped into the treatment zone after the first fracturing fluid ispumped into the treatment zone but at least before the last 2 wellborevolumes of the total pumping volume, wherein the second fracturing fluidcomprises the first solid particulate; wherein the first solidparticulate comprises a first particle size range effective for bridgingthe pore throats of a proppant pack formed in the treatment zone by theproppant of the first fracturing fluid, wherein the first particle sizerange has a lower end that is greater than or equal to about 1/13^(th)of the median particle size of the proppant, wherein the first solidparticulate comprises a degradable material that is a dehydratedcompound; wherein the first particle size range has an upper end that isless than or equal to ⅙^(th) of the median size of the proppant; andwherein the first solid particulate is in at least a sufficient amountin the first fracturing fluid to reduce the permeability of at least aregion of the proppant pack at least 50%.
 25. The method according toclaim 24, wherein the second fracturing fluid comprises the proppant.26. The method according to claim 24, wherein the proppant of theproppant pack is equal to or less than 100 U.S. Standard Mesh.
 27. Amethod of increasing the fracture complexity in a treatment zone of asubterranean formation, wherein the subterranean formation ischaracterized by having a matrix permeability less than 1.0 microDarcy,the method comprising the step of: pumping one or more fracturing fluidsinto a far-field region of the treatment zone of the subterraneanformation at a rate and pressure above the fracture pressure of thetreatment zone, wherein a first fracturing fluid of the one or morefracturing fluids comprises a first solid particulate, wherein: (a) thefirst solid particulate comprises a first particle size range effectivefor bridging the pore throats of a proppant pack previously formed inthe far-field region of the treatment zone, wherein the first particlesize range has a lower end that is greater than or equal to about1/13^(th) of the median particle size of the proppant, and wherein thefirst particle size range has an upper end that is less than or equal to⅙^(th) of the median size of the proppant; (b) the first solidparticulate comprises a degradable material that is a dehydratedcompound; and (c) the first solid particulate is in at least asufficient amount in the first fracturing fluid to reduce thepermeability of at least a region of the proppant pack at least 50%. 28.The method according to claim 27, wherein the proppant of the proppantpack is equal to or less than 100 U.S. Standard Mesh.